[ECODP-dev] metadata label update

[Darwin P]

Hi Bert,

This seems like an odd decision to me - In our experience it is often very
useful to have a link back to the source off the dataset. Most users using
the catalogue won't be RDF experts so the concept of a URI that doesn't
link anywhere will simply confuse them. Can we discuss please?

Thanks,

Darwin

Darwin Peltan
Project Manager

The Open Knowledge Foundation
http://www.okfn.org

Skype: darwinp
Twitter: @darwin


On 16 May 2013 09:25, Bert Van Nuffelen <bert.van.nuffelen at tenforce.com>wrote:

> Hi John and Darwin,
>
> yesterday we had a followup meeting on the ontology modeling. In that we
> discussed the metadata field url. Because the field is inserted with URI's
> which are not necessary dereferenceable, PO decided to make the visitor
> clear that this is a URI and not a URL.
>
> Action: change the label URL to URI for the dataset.
>
> For the rest everything stays the same for this field.
>
> kind regards,
>
> Bert
>
> --
> Bert Van Nuffelen
>
> Semantic Technologies Software Architect at TenForce
> www.tenforce.be
>
> Bert.Van.Nuffelen at tenforce.com
> Office: +32 (0)16 31 48 60
> Mobile:+32 479 06 24 26
> skype: bert.van.nuffelen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecodp-dev mailing list
> Ecodp-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ecodp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/private/ecodp-dev/attachments/20130516/8a6998ee/attachment.html>