[od-discuss] Is the Irish PSI license compliant with OpenDefinition.org

[Rufus Pollock]

Yes, agreeing with Mike here: -1

While the motivations for these kinds of restrictions on use, are
understandable they are unacceptable as they rapidly destry
interoperability.

Rufus

On 29 June 2011 00:43, Mike Linksvayer <ml at creativecommons.org> wrote:
> -1
>
> 4.1(4) not using the document: (a) for the principal purpose of advertising
> or promoting a particular product or service;
>
> other conditions in section 4 may be problematic as well.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Calling all OpenDefinition.org experts!
>>
>> Do people think this is OpenDefinition.org compliant?
>>
>> http://psi.gov.ie/files/2010/03/PSI-Licence.pdf
>>
>> Votes? +1 -1 +0 -0
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Gray
>>
>> Community Coordinator
>> The Open Knowledge Foundation
>> http://blog.okfn.org
>>
>> http://twitter.com/jwyg
>> http://identi.ca/jwyg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> od-discuss mailing list
>> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
>
>
>
> --
> https://creativecommons.net/ml
>
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
>
>



-- 
Co-Founder, Open Knowledge Foundation
Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age
http://www.okfn.org/ - http://blog.okfn.org/