[od-discuss] UK OGL Compliant?

[Herb Lainchbury]

Wow.  Nice site update!

> We could perhaps start a 'texts/' directory for the actual texts of

I think that would be very useful.


> Although "this" might be two things:
> - approval (or not) of UK OGL
> - updating of the OD itself, which has been done before (1.0 to 1.1)
> but I don't know exactly how or when

Yes, I think there are two things - and if it won't cause too much delay, I
would suggest updating the OD first.


H


On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Mike Linksvayer <ml at creativecommons.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> wrote:
> > On 13 February 2012 21:56, Mike Linksvayer <ml at creativecommons.org>
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Herb Lainchbury
> >> <herb at dynamic-solutions.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi Folks.  How do we move forward on this?   Is there a board that
> needs to
> >>> vote?
> >
> > It's the Advisory Panel of the Open Definition, see:
> > <http://opendefinition.org/licenses/process/>
>
> Although "this" might be two things:
> - approval (or not) of UK OGL
> - updating of the OD itself, which has been done before (1.0 to 1.1)
> but I don't know exactly how or when
>
> >> I don't know about final approval, which I imagine might be the OKFN
> >> board, but there is an Open Definition advisory group that I think
> >> I've cc'd here and obviously should be consulted (but it may be
> >> everyone is on both lists) -- for context see this subject in
> >> Dec/Jan/Feb od-discuss archives
> >> http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/
> >
> > Yes, that's right and see above. I'd like to suggest we start (a
> > regular) OD phone con / skype which can be a focal point for final
> > decisions on these types of issues. If this sounds good I, or my
> > colleague Daniel (in cc), can boot a doodle poll for a suitable date.
>
> Great
>
> >> Also it makes sense to have a feedback period, reaching out to, at the
> >> least I'd think
> >>
> >> - Stewards/communities of neighboring definitions (OSI, FSF, Debian,
> >> Freedom Defined)
> >> - Stewards/communities of OD-compliant licenses
> >> - Some OKF sub-communities/projects/lists that would be interested
> >>
> >> Rufus did mention in
> >> http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/2012-January/000100.html
> >> having some kind of license review meeting, which I think could
> >> conclude in need for definition clarification, or just start with
> >> that. I haven't seen a followup yet.
> >
> > See above. I think this is definitely required (perhaps aim for
> quarterly).
> >
> >>> Mike, I think that putting it in git is a great idea.  I wonder if a
> >>> markdown version of the license might be a better way to capture
> content
> >>
> >> s/license/definition/ :)
> >
> > I think this is a great idea. BTW, i've just done a big overhaul of:
> >
> > <http://licenses.opendefinition.org/>
>
> Looks very nice. I like the button at the very bottom of the page.
>
> > There's an associated repo here:
> >
> > <https://github.com/okfn/licenses>
> >
> > We could perhaps start a 'texts/' directory for the actual texts of
> > licenses (when we first booted the licenses 'repo' and service 2y ago
> > we'd wanted to be cautious about duplicating but a versionable repo of
> > open licenses would be really useful.
>
> Yes, that would be nice. Definitions too. :)
>
> >>> diffs?  That way the styles are independent of the content and it's
> easy to
> >>> see what's changed.
> >>
> >> I assumed it was being kept in HTML in WordPress, but if a markdown
> >> version is available/being used with a markdown plugin to publish,
> >> clearly that would be better.
> >
> > We definitely want plain text / markdown. That's actually how we keep
> > the Open Data Commons licenses in source form.
>
> Great.
>



-- 
Herb Lainchbury
Dynamic Solutions Inc.
www.dynamic-solutions.com
http://twitter.com/herblainchbury
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20120215/7b28905f/attachment-0001.html>