[od-discuss] O[K]D?

[Mike Linksvayer]

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Mike Linksvayer <ml at gondwanaland.com> wrote:
> Mails from threads earlier this year about the name of the Open
> [Knowledge] Definition. I think the summary is that
> * "Open Definition" is how OKF people talk
> * "Open Definition" is shorter
> * "Open Knowledge Definition" doesn't claim to define openness generally

Everyone else on the call liked OD, so going with that. Here are the notes

...
2. OKD or OD for the main definition name; see
http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/2013-June/000427.html

* RP: Open Definition [for Data / Content / Knowledge] seems good.
  * URL: http://opendefinition.org/current/  (or latest)?
* Baden / Herb / Andrew: like breadth, simplicity of “Open Definition”

DECISION: Open Definition by default.
...

We didn't actually discuss the URL. I don't have a strong feeling.
Anyone commenting on/alternative to /current before I move it there
(I'm pretty sure the WordPress install has a redirect plugin,
otherwise I'll ask someone to set up redirects at lower level)?

Mike