[od-discuss] Fwd: [Open-education] Refining the Definition of “Open” in Open Content

[Baden Appleyard]

FYI.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Marieke Guy" <marieke.guy at okfn.org>
Date: 06/08/2014 12:08 AM
Subject: [Open-education] Refining the Definition of “Open” in Open Content
To: <open-education at lists.okfn.org>
Cc:

 For those who may have missed it...David Wiley has written a blog post
redefining the 'open' in open content.

http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3442

David argues against non-commericial licences and share alike licences. He
also references the ALMS Framework
<http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/774> and talks about
the need to avoid poor technical choices (locking in to expensive or
difficult to use tools, not enabling content to be easily remixed). Much of
this ties in with the recent discussion had on this list around editor
tools for building and remixing OERs
<http://booktype.okfn.org/open-education-handbook/_draft/_v/1.0/editor-tools-for-building-and-remixing-oers/>
.

Any thoughts?

Marieke
-- 

Marieke Guy
LinkedUp <http://linkedup-project.eu/> Project Community Coordinator |
skype: mariekeguy | tel: 44 (0) 1285 885681 | @mariekeguy
<http://twitter.com/mariekeguy>
Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/>
*Empowering through Open Knowledge*
http://okfn.org/ | @okfn <http://twitter.com/okfn>| OKF on Facebook | Blog
| Newsletter
http://remoteworker.wordpress.com

_______________________________________________
open-education mailing list
open-education at lists.okfn.org
https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-education
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20140806/13095386/attachment-0002.html>