[od-discuss] v2.0dev Review Requested

Tue Jul 29 01:40:15 UTC 2014

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/28/2014 03:42 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
> On 28/07/14 12:24 PM, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> 
>> "Knowledge is open if anyone is free to use, modify, and 
>> redistribute it ? subject only, at most, to requirements for 
>> provenance and openness."

Someone pointed out offlist that this could look tautological at first
glance...

> Yes provenance and openness are better than attribution and
> share-alike.
> 
> I'd prefer "protections for" to "requirements for" but this is
> still a nicely robust definition.

...but not with preservation or protection.

If others agree we should update the tagline then, we could do:

"Knowledge is open if anyone is free to use, modify, and redistribute
it -- subject only, at most, to protections for provenance and openness."

"preservation of" in place of "protections for" would probably work too.

Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=BfyH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----