[od-discuss] v2.0dev Review Requested

[Herb Lainchbury]

Though I like this suggestion to relax 2.1.3, there are nuances that make
me feel we need further discussion on it so I am going to suggest that we
table this for a future release.  I see no harm in leaving it as is since
that's the way it's been for some time.


I think we've covered all of the issues raised thus far.


Unless there is something else we need to discuss, I think we are ready to
have a vote on approval of v2.0.  I would ask everyone to have another look
at v2.0dev here :

https://github.com/okfn/opendefinition/blob/master/source/open-definition-dev.markdown

and consider existing licenses that we've made determinations on, and see
if you can find any final issues that need to be discussed.

I will call for a vote in a new thread shortly.

Herb



On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Paul Norman <penorman at mac.com> wrote:

>
> On 7/30/2014 11:39 PM, Herb Lainchbury wrote:
>
> It is titled "Open Government License for public sector information", and
> further down it states, "This licence does not grant you any right to use
> the Information in a way that suggests any official status".  I think if I
> were to publish my work under a license with that title, it would suggest
> some official status.
>
>  It may be correct that I could indeed use this license for my work, by
> claiming I'm not the government, but I wouldn't do that.  In effect this
> license is non-reusable to me as a data publisher, so I would look for one
> I could use.
>
>
> I never said it was a *good* license for reuse, just that it could be
> done. If you don't care about attribution it's probably no worse than some
> other little-used licenses as at least there is a moderate body of
> understanding on how OGL licensed data can be used.
>
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20140731/159a2fee/attachment-0003.html>