[od-discuss] OGL UK v3.0 decision time

[Aaron Wolf]

Re: my edits, some of them aren't even in the places where they are legally
relevant, and some are as basic as a missing Oxford comma…

--
Aaron Wolf
wolftune.com

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
wrote:

> I'm +1 on the submitted version.
>
> Re Aaron's edits whilst it is great to get these I suspect we are now at a
> fairly late stage and imagine National Archives don't want to take this
> past legal at their end. As I could not see anything legally substantive in
> the edits I'm happy to accept the original version.
>
> Rufus
>
>
>
> On 21 October 2014 18:21, Mike Linksvayer <ml at gondwanaland.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm +1 on the version submitted for approval (switch from "suggesting" to
>> "view" mode to see just that) and doubtless would be also on a version with
>> any non-substantive edits accepted, should the submitter wish to resubmit
>> with any.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Aaron Wolf <wolftune at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I *just* posted new edits, sorry… Should probably be accepted and
>>> clarified whether and which will be included in any voting…
>>>
>>> --
>>> Aaron Wolf
>>> wolftune.com
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Herb Lainchbury <
>>> herb at dynamic-solutions.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I believe our discussion regarding UK OGL v3.0 draft is complete.
>>>> Thanks to all who contributed.
>>>>
>>>> The new draft has been posted here:
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C3jPK5U61GU6hMmrEQHJ-TuC8MVPn8ngodlexlQsuRk/edit
>>>>
>>>> A case for approval has been provided here:
>>>> https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/2014-October/001087.html
>>>>
>>>> I call for AC members to vote to indicate whether they agree that the
>>>> proposed OGL v3.0 conforms to the Open Definition (v2.0).
>>>>
>>>> I ask that members vote as soon as they feel comfortable as the license
>>>> publisher is working to a deadline that is fast approaching.
>>>>
>>>> We will continue counting votes for up to two weeks from now or until
>>>> we have enough +1s that it would be impossible for -1s to overturn.
>>>>
>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks all,
>>>> Herb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> od-discuss mailing list
>>>> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> od-discuss mailing list
>>> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> od-discuss mailing list
>> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> *Rufus PollockFounder and President | skype: rufuspollock | @rufuspollock
> <https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/> - see
> how data can change the world**http://okfn.org/ <http://okfn.org/> |
> @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN> | Open Knowledge on Facebook
> <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> |  Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/>*
>
> The Open Knowledge Foundation is a not-for-profit organisation.  It is
> incorporated in England & Wales as a company limited by guarantee, with
> company number 05133759.  VAT Registration № GB 984404989. Registered
> office address: Open Knowledge Foundation, St John’s Innovation Centre,
> Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WS, UK.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20141021/e7438522/attachment-0003.html>