[od-discuss] Fwd: Conformance - Open Government License - Surrey 1.0

[Herb Lainchbury]

Sorry, meant to include this link:
https://github.com/okfn/opendefinition/blob/master/licenses/inreview/OGL-Surrey-BC-2.0.md


On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Herb Lainchbury <herb at dynamic-solutions.com
> wrote:

> I have placed a copy of the revised Open Government License - Surrey (City
> of Surrey, BC, Canada) into our /licenses/inreview repository.
>
> As noted in this thread they have adopted our recommendation and one of
> our two suggestions.
>
> I intend to call for a vote on this new version (2.0) in in a few days.
>
> Herb
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Aaron Wolf <wolftune at riseup.net> wrote:
>
>> Great news! Looks compliant to me upon quick read-through.
>>
>> On 02/13/2015 11:58 AM, Herb Lainchbury wrote:
>> > The City of Surrey has modified their license in response to our
>> > letter.  See below.
>> >
>> > They have incorporated our recommendation to remove an exemption and
>> > they have also incorporated one of our two suggestions.
>> >
>> > The suggestion that they didn't incorporate, which we said was not
>> > strictly required for conformance, is making their license re-usable by
>> > others.
>> >
>> > Herb
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: *Simpson, Sean* <STSimpson at surrey.ca <mailto:STSimpson at surrey.ca
>> >>
>> > Date: Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:01 AM
>> > Subject: RE: Conformance - Open Government License - Surrey 1.0
>> > To: Herb Lainchbury <herb at dynamic-solutions.com
>> > <mailto:herb at dynamic-solutions.com>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Thank you Herb, please have a look at our updated License____
>> >
>> > http://data.surrey.ca/pages/open-government-licence-surrey____
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > It is now similar to OGL Canada, without the reference to ‘records’ that
>> > OGL – Newfoundland/Labrador still has included.____
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > Cheers,____
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > SEAN SIMPSON | GIS MANAGER
>> >
>> > *____*
>> >
>> > *CITY OF SURREY____*
>> >
>> > 13450 104th Ave, Surrey, BC, Canada V3T 1V8
>> > T 604.591.4730 <tel:604.591.4730> | www.surrey.ca
>> > <http://www.surrey.ca/>  ____
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > *____*
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > *From:*herb.lainchbury at gmail.com <mailto:herb.lainchbury at gmail.com>
>> > [mailto:herb.lainchbury at gmail.com <mailto:herb.lainchbury at gmail.com>]
>> > *On Behalf Of *Herb Lainchbury
>> > *Sent:* February-06-15 2:46 PM
>> > *To:* Simpson, Sean
>> > *Subject:* Conformance - Open Government License - Surrey 1.0____
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Simpson____
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > I am contacting you today on behalf of the Open Definition Advisory
>> > Council, regarding a request we received on November 4, 2013 to review
>> > the Open Government License - Surrey version 1.0 for conformance to the
>> > Open Definition <http://opendefinition.org/>.____
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > We feel that the license cannot be considered conformant with the Open
>> > Definition.____
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > Please find attached a letter which explains this decision and the
>> > recommendations of the Open Definition Advisory Council should you wish
>> > to use a conformant license.____
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > Thank you for your consideration.____
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > -- ____
>> >
>> > __ __
>> >
>> > Herb Lainchbury____
>> >
>> > Chair, Open Definition Advisory Council____
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > od-discuss mailing list
>> > od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> > https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> od-discuss mailing list
>> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20150226/29e476c5/attachment-0003.html>