[odc-discuss] CC SA 4 draft 1 And The ODbL

Sun Apr 8 11:30:02 UTC 2012

>> I'm not sure whether this clashes, but I believe we should definitely
>> make sure CC-BY-SA 4 and ODbL will be fully compatible
> The ODbL and BY-SA 4.0d1 both require derivatives containing (substantial)
> extracts to be placed under the same licence. They clash, IMO.
> And we need to be careful to define what we mean by "compatibility", in
> terms of what actually happens when I have BY-SA 40d work A and ODbL work B
> and wish to make a map using substantial amounts of data from both.

In my mind, such compatibility would mean the result could
alternatively be placed under either CC-BY-SA either ODbL without
anymore question.
For instance for contents, I believe the CC-BY-SA and Art Libre
licences are considered compatible, it would be best if we could
ensure the same thing within ODbL and CC-BY-SA4, wouldn't it?

This is why I believe we should try to have CC-BY-SA 4 precise the
derivative work can be placed under both CC-BY-SA 4 or ODbL when
speaking about data, and include the same kind of reference to
CC-BY-SA 4 within an ODBL 1.1, what do you think?

>

For instance for contents, I believe the CC-BY-SA and Art Libre
licences are considered compatible, it would be best if we could
ensure the same thing within ODbL and CC-BY-SA4, wouldn't it?
> - Rob.
>
> _______________________________________________
> odc-discuss mailing list
> odc-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/odc-discuss