[okfn-be] OKFN review of the walloon Plan Stratégique Géomatique

[Philippe Duchesne]

Hello Katleen,

no, i haven't seen anything explicit on that topic.
I have added a few comments in that direction in our review, more
specifically regarding the choice of the Open Data licence, and the choice
of metadata vocabularies.
But I agree, this is very important. I'll add a few lines on this in the
general comments.

--p.


On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Katleen Janssen <
Katleen.Janssen at kuleuven.be> wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
>  I've only had a quick read through, but it looks very good. Is there
> anything in the plan about cooperating more/better with the other regions
> and the federal level? There have been a number of attempts of cooperation,
> but none of them seem to work very well, or if they do, they're hidden
> quite well. Particularly for geodata this is important.
>
>  Best regards,
> Katleen
>
> ******************
> dr. Katleen Janssen
> EU projects advisor
> KU Leuven - LRD
>
> On 23 Mar 2014, at 22:15, "Pieter Colpaert" <pieter.colpaert at okfn.org>
> wrote:
>
>  Correct! We hope to be able to extract some useful comments which we can
> turn into blog posts to explain these points to a broader audience.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Pieter
>
> On 2014-03-23 22:12, Philippe Duchesne wrote:
>
> Besides, this is currently only in french as it was our focus for
> tomorrow's deadline, but it will be translated afterwards, right Pieter?
>
>  --p.
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Pieter Colpaert <
> pieter.colpaert at okfn.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please do read it! This is the official OKFN Belgium vision
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Pieter
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2014-03-23 22:07, Philippe Duchesne wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>  we (the OKFN) have been formally asked a few weeks ago to review and
>> comment the Plan Stratégique Géomatique Wallon (here on the OSM website :
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/7/7b/Projet_de_plan_strat%C3%A9gique_g%C3%A9omatique_pour_la_Wallonie_%28Belgique%29.pdf
>> )
>>
>>  Here's the review document that the OKFN intends to send :
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wGZZndpoLEgJuT5fvVv6IkjaLKy6D43l5CUnTBo4z4g/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>  Feel free to comment on this.
>> This document is to be sent by tomorrow COB, so this doesn't leave you
>> much time to comment. I apologize for the short notice, but that was as
>> fast as time permits...
>>
>>  Thank you for your contributions,
>> best regards,
>>
>>  --p.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> okfn-be mailing listokfn-be at lists.okfn.orghttps://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-be
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-be
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> +32 486 74 71 22
>>
>> Open Knowledge Foundation Belgiumhttp://okfn.be
>>
>> Open Transport Working Group OKFNhttp://transport.okfn.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> okfn-be mailing list
>> okfn-be at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-be
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-be
>>
>>
>
> --
> +32 486 74 71 22
>
> Open Knowledge Foundation Belgiumhttp://okfn.be
>
> Open Transport Working Group OKFNhttp://transport.okfn.org
>
>   _______________________________________________
> okfn-be mailing list
> okfn-be at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-be
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-be
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-be/attachments/20140323/e3f6883b/attachment-0003.html>