[okfn-discuss] For Scholars, Web Changes Sacred Rite of Peer Review - NYTimes.com

[Daniel Mietchen]

Public peer review of the kind described there has already been in use
in some journals for years, and their experience suggests that it
increases the quality of both the sbumissions and the reviews, while
decreasing the load for reviewers and making their work visible (if
they choose not to remain anonymous).

For a recent overview, see
http://www.slideshare.net/UlrichPoeschl/poschl-oaspa-prague2010up7 .

Daniel

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org> wrote:
> Copying this to new humanities working group!
>
> Could be worth getting in touch?
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Mr. Puneet Kishor <punkish at eidesis.org> wrote:
>> cnāwan vs. crūdan
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/arts/24peer.html?hp=&pagewanted=all
>>
>>
>> --
>> Puneet Kishor http://punkish.org
>> Carbon Model http://carbonmodel.org
>> Charter Member, Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org
>> Science Commons Fellow, http://sciencecommons.org/about/whoweare/kishor
>> Nelson Institute, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Assertions are politics; backing up assertions with evidence is science
>> =======================================================================
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> okfn-discuss mailing list
>> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Gray
>
> Community Coordinator
> The Open Knowledge Foundation
> http://blog.okfn.org
>
> http://twitter.com/jwyg
> http://identi.ca/jwyg
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
>



-- 
http://www.google.com/profiles/daniel.mietchen