[okfn-discuss] Advise on standard licenses

[Rufus Pollock]

I think the best thing to do here would be to open a thread in the Open
Definition section of the forums:

https://discuss.okfn.org/c/projects/OpenDefinition

I'll also then ping the open definition discussion list.

Rufus

On 3 November 2015 at 08:24, Pieter Colpaert <pieter.colpaert at okfn.org>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The Belgian government is in the process to define standard licenses for
> government services to use for its open data. As Open Knowledge Belgium we
> would love to give advice on this, as we would love CC0 to be the default
> license for all government services, without exception.
>
> Do we have some documents that we could reuse from other governments
> (e.g.,UK, France or The Netherlands) where standard licenses are discussed
> for open data?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Pieter
>
> --
> +32 486 74 71 22
>
> Board of directors
> Open Knowledge Belgium
> http://openknowledge.be
>
> International Open Transport community
> http://transport.okfn.org
>
> Belgian Open Transport community
> http://transport.openknowledge.be
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
>



-- 

*Rufus PollockFounder and President | +44 07795 176 976 | skype:
rufuspollock | @rufuspollock <https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>Open
Knowledge International <http://okfn.org/> - A world where knowledge
creates power for the many, not the few**http://okfn.org/
<http://okfn.org/> | @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN> | Open Knowledge on
Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> |  Blog
<http://blog.okfn.org/>*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/attachments/20151103/dd6cfa30/attachment-0002.html>