[okfn-za] [HacksHackers Cape Town] Please Sue Me

[Adi Eyal]

Thanks Niki

Actually, programming is just one of the many skills that are
required. We need the following (in no particular order):

1. Scrapers (there are some tools that can help non-programmers scrape
simple data)
2. Identification of worthwhile datasets
3. General project cheerleaders
4. Legal opinions would be welcome
5. Discussions around data availability. The more we discuss this
amongst ourselves and in other public spaces, the more it because a
real issue.
6. Possibly a bunch more - we'll figure it out as we go along.

The bottom line is - don't exclude yourself if you're not a coder.
There are other dimensions to this problem.

A nice side-effect of this project is that we can start putting
together an data census in South Africa. What data is available and
where.

Adi

On 30 April 2013 15:24, Niki Moore <nikimoore007 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I really wish I could help you, but not being a hacker myself I wouldn't
> know where to start.  However, what I am very happy to do is take some of
> the hacked stuff and point out how useless it is in the first place... for
> instance, the DSD database of NGOs is five years out of date, and 90% of
> their records are wrong.  One of the biggest problems on the property roll
> is that it is inaccurate.  I could go on.....
>
> Maybe one of the reasons why the government is so protective of their
> information is because they know that most of it is useless for purposes of
> governance.  So - perhaps a side angle would be that it is important for the
> public to have access to this information so that they can check that it is
> correct!
>
> N
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Adi Eyal <adi at burgercom.co.za> wrote:
>>
>> Some of you may have read an article that I posted recently on the
>> OKFN mailing list and on the Daily Maverick with regards to the
>> openness of government data in South Africa.
>>
>> In that article, I described an exercise that I undertook to gain
>> commercial access to that data. I have had very few responses, all of
>> which expressly forbid commercial use.
>>
>> As per the Copyright Act, I am not certain that most of this data
>> qualifies for copyright protection as it usually contains a database
>> of facts where no innovative process was used to produce said data. On
>> the moral front, it seems absurd that data produced using public funds
>> should be restricted in such a way. In an ideal world an open data
>> licence would be attached to all government data allowing for re-use
>> without permission or restriction. Please see an excerpt from a
>> comment that I received from the legal advisor to parliament:
>>
>> "Should you wish to request permission or a licence to use information
>> on our webpage for commercial gain, I suggest you indicate the item
>> you want to use and the specific purpose for its use to allow us to
>> make an informed decision. "
>>
>> I it is unacceptable to be required to request permission to re-use a
>> list of MPs listed on www.parliament.gov.za
>>
>> I would like to propose a provocative response that will hopefully
>> spark a conversation (and despite the codename, not get me sued).
>> Volunteers and comments and criticisms welcome.
>>
>> The idea is as follows:
>>
>> 1. Build a website registered at www.pleasesueme.co.za
>> 2. Scrape a bunch of data from government website, stuff that seems to
>> not be copyrightable
>> 3. Upload it to the website and offer it up for sale for a nominal
>> fee. It needs to be sold so as to assert a right for general re-use.
>> Sold data will be re-released under an open licence.
>>
>> The money (i expect very little data to be actually sold) will be used
>> to fund a war-chest (however small) for a legal defense if it comes to
>> that. My gut feeling is that we won't get any response at all but by
>> being provocative, we might get people thinking about why it might be
>> important to push open data licences within government. We might get a
>> take-down notice which would be evaluated based on merit. I can't
>> imagine (though I am not a lawyer) that any public agency has the
>> time, money or wherewithal to take this to court.
>>
>> Any responses, including flames about how I'm being naive or that
>> antagonism is not the correct approach are welcome.
>>
>> Adi
>>
>> --
>> Adi Eyal
>> Data Specialist
>> phone: +27 78 014 2469
>> skype: adieyalcas
>> linkedin: http://za.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Adi/Eyal
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "HacksHackers CapeTown" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to hackshackers-capetown+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send an email to
>> hackshackers-capetown at googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> 7th Avenue Communications
> 031 - 205-8331
> 083 - 758-4483
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "HacksHackers CapeTown" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to hackshackers-capetown+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send an email to
> hackshackers-capetown at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>



-- 
Adi Eyal
Data Specialist
phone: +27 78 014 2469
skype: adieyalcas
linkedin: http://za.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Adi/Eyal