[open-bibliography] A 4 star classification-scheme for open cultural meta-data

[Jonathan Gray]

Just to follow up on this, as Karen says, this originated from the
LOD-LAM conference in San Francisco. I don't have enough domain
specific knowledge about how useful this would be for cultural
heritage organisations (what needs it is addressing, etc) - but I'm
pleased to see that it looks like all 4 options are compliant with
OpenDefinition.org.

For anyone who uses Google Docs, there is now a conversation in the
comments thread which has emerged (and which might be of interest to
folks here). For anyone who doesn't use Google Docs, there is now a
copy of the document here:

http://lod-lam.net/summit/2011/06/06/proposed-a-4-star-classification-scheme-for-linked-open-cultural-metadata/

And a response here:

http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/06/06/peter-suber-on-the-4-star-openness-rating/

I will try and ping a few people to see if we can also get a guest
blog about this for the OKF Blog!

All the best,

Jonathan

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org> wrote:
> Thought this might be interesting to people here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10u2bNMShqPQ6sIhcQK6zDl11gMNIzpfE8XPb7aexqac/edit?hl=en_US
>
> --
> Jonathan Gray
>
> Community Coordinator
> The Open Knowledge Foundation
> http://blog.okfn.org
>
> http://twitter.com/jwyg
> http://identi.ca/jwyg
>



-- 
Jonathan Gray

Community Coordinator
The Open Knowledge Foundation
http://blog.okfn.org

http://twitter.com/jwyg
http://identi.ca/jwyg