[open-bibliography] Wikipedia project: bibliographic-archival data base
Karen Coyle
kcoyle at kcoyle.net
Thu Sep 15 21:23:00 UTC 2011
Yes, it is very complex. When I was doing the rights metadata work at
the U of California, I ended up providing a way to store the relevant
information that supports a copyright determination - like copyright
holder, author (because you need to know if the author is dead or
alive, even if they are not the copyright holder), jurisdiction (the
rules are different in different countries), contact information, etc.
If the author has assigned a license to their work, like a CC license,
then that would be a key piece of information.
What you cannot do, however, is determine what the copyright status
is, at least not if you are not absolutely sure.
The work I did before on this is here:
http://www.cdlib.org/groups/rmg/
The users guidelines document explains things best:
http://www.cdlib.org/groups/rmg/docs/copyrightMD_user_guidelines.pdf
Some of it may not be relevant to all situations; as I said before,
this had to also cover archives of papers, etc.
kc
Quoting William Waites <ww at styx.org>:
> * [2011-09-13 13:35:09 -0700] Karen Coyle <kcoyle at kcoyle.net> écrit:
>
>> But we do need metadata for rights in order to do that. I did a rights
>> metadata schema for the University of California some years ago,
>> although it may be too complex (it was designed to also meet the needs
>> of archives). DC has a rights field that is very simple - it would be
>> good, though, to define a set of values. Does anyone know of a rights
>> vocabulary we could use?
>
> There is some of this in the CC machine readable stuff, for describing
> the nature of the licenses, the terms, who must be attributed when,
> etc., sufficient that you could say that their standard licenses are
> just different configurations of these primitives.
>
> I haven't looked very closely at it, and this starts to get into
> things like modelling legal documents, agreements, legislation,
> contracts, etc. if you look at it too closely and then generalise.
>
> -w
> --
> William Waites <mailto:ww at styx.org>
> http://river.styx.org/ww/ <sip:ww at styx.org>
> F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB 3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>
--
Karen Coyle
kcoyle at kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
More information about the open-bibliography
mailing list