[open-bibliography] Fwd: Re: [dpla-discussion] DPLA Board of Directors call: Thursday, February 14, 1:00 PM EST

Jonathan Gray jonathan.gray at okfn.org
Sun Feb 17 10:33:09 UTC 2013


That would be great Karen! If you framed this for a general audience
(explaining background and why this is important) we could run it on the
main OKF blog...


On 16 February 2013 21:18, Karen Coyle <kcoyle at kcoyle.net> wrote:

> I think this is worthy of a blog post. Would you like me to start a draft,
> and I can run that by the list before posting (I can't remember if I can
> post, but Adrian can).
>
> BTW, #4 is:
>
> 04.     Free and Unencumbered Access to Metadata.
>
> Given the purposes of the policy and the copyright status of the metadata,
> and pursuant to the DPLA’s terms of service, the DPLA’s users are free to
> harvest, collect, modify, and/or otherwise use any metadata contained in
> the DPLA.
>
> [thunderous applause]
>
> kc
>
>
> On 2/16/13 10:26 AM, Tom Johnson wrote:
>
>> This was my impression as well.
>>
>>  Does anyone know (or can anyone work out) whether CC0 will be a
>>>
>> requirement for all metadata in DPLA?
>>
>> This is an important question which may have been a bit ambiguous in the
>> original statement. The revised statement is clear:
>>
>> "The DPLA’s partners agree that the vast majority of metadata is not
>> subject to copyright. To the extent that metadata provided by the DPLA’s
>> partners may be protected by copyright, however, those partners have
>> agreed to dedicate such metadata to the public domain pursuant to a CC0
>> license. /This means that any raw metadata imported into the DPLA, which
>> is protected by copyright, is provided under a CC0 license." /[emphasis
>>
>> in original]
>>
>> Under the statement as written, not only do contributing institutions
>> agree to release their metadata as CC0 via DPLA, but there is an
>> implicit agreement not to argue any copyright interest at all. I think
>> the addition of point 4 is a nice touch as well. It doesn't add anything
>> new, but it's a nice human readable summary clarifying the spirit of the
>> policy.
>>
>> It's an excellent statement and I think we should do what we can to make
>> sure that this multi-pronged approach is adopted by other large
>> institutions.
>>
>> Oregon State University is in the process of discussing similar language
>> with our legal department to apply to our published datasets.
>>
>> - Tom
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:52 AM, John Wilkin <jpwilkin at umich.edu
>> <mailto:jpwilkin at umich.edu>> wrote:
>>
>>     I'm not a DPLA insider, either, but I'm close enough to say with
>>     confidence that Tom's read of the intent, outlined in his paragraph
>>     that starts with "I think what they're going for here," is exactly
>>     right and nicely characterized.
>>
>>
>>     On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Tom Morris <tfmorris at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:tfmorris at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Jonathan Gray
>>         <jonathan.gray at okfn.org <mailto:jonathan.gray at okfn.org**>> wrote:
>>
>>             Thanks Karen. Great it sounds like they are adopting a
>>             policy which include CC0. Does anyone know (or can anyone
>>             work out) whether CC0 will be a requirement for all metadata
>>             in DPLA?
>>
>>
>>         I'm not a DPLA insider, but my reading is that all contributing
>>         institutions will be required to contribute anything
>>         copyrightable under a CC0 license.
>>
>>             Two bits that I find quite bizarre:
>>
>>                * "Gore pointed out that in her experience working with
>>             prospective data-providers, most cultural heritage
>>             institutions are comfortable with the idea that the vast
>>             majority of metadata is not copyrightable" -> Presumably
>>             talking mainly about US GLAM institutions. Is this true? And
>>             does 'not copyrightable' equate to 'happy to release in bulk
>>             under CC0'?
>>                * "Courant said that he thinks CC0 is still too
>>             restrictive of a license, which is why he likes
>>             using it as a ‘backstop’, which the policy does." -> Not
>>             sure what 'too restrictive' means in this context? Too open?
>>             Too strong? To legally specific? Anyone know?
>>
>>
>>         I think what they're going for here is that no license should be
>>         necessary at all because the metadata can't be copyrighted.  I
>>         suspect they want that to be their primary position, but are
>>         including CC0 as a fallback/fail-safe.  It's a bit of a nuanced
>>         position and I could be misreading it, but that's my
>> interpretation.
>>
>>         Tom
>>
>>
>>             J.
>>
>>             On 15 February 2013 23:20, Karen Coyle <lists at kcoyle.net
>>             <mailto:lists at kcoyle.net>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Open Biblio Folks: much of the discussion in the notes
>>                 is about licensing of bib data. Perhaps we can read and
>>                 discuss?
>>
>>                 kc
>>
>>
>>                 -------- Original Message --------
>>                 Subject:        Re: [dpla-discussion] DPLA Board of
>> Directors
>>                 call: Thursday, February 14, 1:00 PM EST
>>                 Date:   Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:12:16 -0500
>>                 From:   Kenny Whitebloom
>>                 <kwhitebloom at cyber.law.**harvard.edu<kwhitebloom at cyber.law.harvard.edu>
>> >
>>                 <mailto:kwhitebloom at cyber.law.**harvard.edu<kwhitebloom at cyber.law.harvard.edu>
>> >
>>                 Reply-To:       dpla-discussion at eon.law.**harvard.edu<dpla-discussion at eon.law.harvard.edu>
>>                 <mailto:dpla-discussion at eon.**law.harvard.edu<dpla-discussion at eon.law.harvard.edu>
>> >
>>                 To:     dpla-discussion at eon.law.**harvard.edu<dpla-discussion at eon.law.harvard.edu>
>>                 <mailto:dpla-discussion at eon.**law.harvard.edu<dpla-discussion at eon.law.harvard.edu>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                 Dear all,
>>
>>                 Notes from yesterday's Board of Directors call are now
>>                 available at:
>>
>>                 http://dp.la/about/board/**february-14-2013-board-of-**
>> directors-call/<http://dp.la/about/board/february-14-2013-board-of-directors-call/>
>>
>>                 There you will also find the materials discussed during
>>                 the call. Let us know if you have any questions.
>>
>>                 Best,
>>                 Kenny
>>
>>                 On 2/11/2013 2:19 PM, Kenny Whitebloom wrote:
>>
>>>                 Dear all,
>>>
>>>                 The next DPLA Board of Directors call will take place
>>>                 this Thursday, February 14, at 1 PM EST.  This call is
>>>                 open to the public; more information is available on
>>>                 the DPLA website
>>>                 <http://dp.la/about/february-**
>>> 14-2013-board-of-directors-**call<http://dp.la/about/february-14-2013-board-of-directors-call>
>>> >.
>>>
>>>                 The conference line is:
>>>
>>>                 *Dial-in*: 800-501-8979 <tel:800-501-8979>
>>>                 *Access Code*: 2739336
>>>
>>>
>>>                 An agenda for the call is attached, along with
>>>                 supporting materials (also available online
>>>                 <http://dp.la/about/february-**
>>> 14-2013-board-of-directors-**call<http://dp.la/about/february-14-2013-board-of-directors-call>
>>> >).
>>>
>>>                  Please don't hesitate to be in touch with any questions.
>>>
>>>                 Best,
>>>                 Kenny
>>>                 --
>>>                   Kenny Whitebloom
>>>                 Berkman Center for Internet & Society
>>>                 23 Everett Street, 2nd Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138
>>>                 617-384-9107  <tel:617-384-9107>  | kenneth.whitebloom
>>> (skype) |http://cyber.law.harvard.edu
>>>
>>
>>
>>                 --
>>                 Kenny Whitebloom
>>                 Berkman Center for Internet & Society
>>                 23 Everett Street, 2nd Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138
>>                 617-384-9107  <tel:617-384-9107>  | kenneth.whitebloom
>> (skype) |http://cyber.law.harvard.edu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                 ______________________________**_________________
>>                 open-bibliography mailing list
>>                 open-bibliography at lists.okfn.**org<open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>
>>                 <mailto:open-bibliography@**lists.okfn.org<open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>
>> >
>>
>>                 http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**
>> listinfo/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography>
>>                 Unsubscribe:
>>                 http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**options/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-bibliography>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>             --
>>             Jonathan Gray <http://jonathangray.org/> | @jwyg
>>             <http://twitter.com/jwyg>
>>
>>             Director of Policy and Ideas
>>             The Open Knowledge Foundation <http://okfn.org/> | @okfn
>>             <http://twitter.com/okfn>
>>             Support our work: okfn.org/support <http://okfn.org/support/>
>>
>>
>>             ______________________________**_________________
>>             open-bibliography mailing list
>>             open-bibliography at lists.okfn.**org<open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>
>>             <mailto:open-bibliography@**lists.okfn.org<open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>
>> >
>>
>>             http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**listinfo/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography>
>>             Unsubscribe:
>>             http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**options/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-bibliography>
>>
>>
>>
>>         ______________________________**_________________
>>         open-bibliography mailing list
>>         open-bibliography at lists.okfn.**org<open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>
>>         <mailto:open-bibliography@**lists.okfn.org<open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>
>> >
>>
>>         http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**listinfo/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography>
>>         Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**
>> options/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-bibliography>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     John Price Wilkin
>>     ExecutiveDirector, HathiTrust
>>
>>     Associate University Librarian for Publishing and Technology
>>     University Library
>>     818 Hatcher South
>>     University of Michigan
>>     Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1205
>>
>>
>>     ______________________________**_________________
>>     open-bibliography mailing list
>>     open-bibliography at lists.okfn.**org <open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>
>>     <mailto:open-bibliography@**lists.okfn.org<open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>
>> >
>>
>>     http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**listinfo/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography>
>>     Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**
>> options/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-bibliography>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> open-bibliography mailing list
>> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.**org <open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**listinfo/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography>
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**options/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-bibliography>
>>
>>
> --
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle at kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.**org <open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org>
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**listinfo/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography>
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/**options/open-bibliography<http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-bibliography>
>



-- 
Jonathan Gray <http://jonathangray.org/> | @jwyg <http://twitter.com/jwyg>
Director of Policy and Ideas
The Open Knowledge Foundation <http://okfn.org/> |
@okfn<http://twitter.com/okfn>
Support our work: okfn.org/support
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-bibliography/attachments/20130217/535d0509/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the open-bibliography mailing list