[OpenGLAM] cost benefit analysis of open digital content

[Laurel L. Russwurm]

Thanks!  I found Kristin Kelley's definition of the Public Domain so 
perfect that I blogged it:
http://laurelrusswurm.wordpress.com/2013/10/08/what-is-the-public-domain/

regards,
Laurel L. Russwurm

On 13-10-08 03:47 AM, Merete Sanderhoff wrote:
> Great resources shared here!
>
> Another interesting study is Kristin Kelley's survey from this year of 11 American and British museums who have provided open access and have concrete evidence to share of how that affects things like revenue
> http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub157/pub157.pdf
>
> Michael Edson keeps an incredibly valuable list of references to this topic on the Smithsonian Web and New Media Strategy wiki (which is where I found the Kelly report) http://smithsonian-webstrategy.wikispaces.com/Public+Domain+and+Image+Sales+References
>
> Cheers,
> Merete
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: open-glam-bounces at lists.okfn.org [mailto:open-glam-bounces at lists.okfn.org] På vegne af Proffitt,Merrilee
> Sendt: 7. oktober 2013 23:54
> Til: David Farneth; open-glam at lists.okfn.org; Craig Harkema
> Emne: Re: [OpenGLAM] cost benefit analysis of open digital content
>
> Here's another one in the "no one gets rich" category, although probably not exactly what you are looking for.
>
> Erway, Ricky. 2008. Seeking Sustainability. Report produced by OCLC Programs and Research
> http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2008/2008-03.pdf
>
> You might also contact Simon Tanner and see if his research has been updated at all. I believe he still tracks this area.
>
> Merrilee Proffitt, Senior Program Officer
> OCLC Research
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: open-glam-bounces at lists.okfn.org [mailto:open-glam-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of David Farneth
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 1:50 PM
> To: open-glam at lists.okfn.org; Craig Harkema
> Subject: Re: [OpenGLAM] cost benefit analysis of open digital content
>
> I look forward to seeing if anyone can point to some current cost analysis.
>
> This older article by Ken Hamma provides some historical context.  See, especially, footnote 6.
> http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november05/hamma/11hamma.html#!
>
> David
>
>
>
> David Farneth
> Assistant Director
> The Getty Research Institute
> 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 1100
> Los Angeles, CA  90049-1688
>
> office: (310) 440-7076
> mobile: (310) 270-5280
> dfarneth at getty.edu
> Assistant: Cassandra Heiser: (310) 440-7433
>   
>
>
>>>> "Harkema, Craig" <craig.harkema at usask.ca> 10/7/2013 1:27 PM >>>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm wondering if any of you have come across anything regarding the cost benefit of opening up digital content? In other words, I'm curious about just how much organization make off of charging for high res files, for example, versus the accounting, general overhead, rescanning, and so forth that is required? Which is not to mention any of the barriers to use charging fees such as this imposes.
>
> Craig
> ________________________________
>
>
> [cid:image001.jpg at 01CDD6B6.8499DB40] Craig Harkema Digital Projects Librarian University Library, University of Saskatchewan
> Tel: (306) 966-5980 | saskhistoryonline.ca<http://saskhistoryonline.ca> | twitter.com/saskhistory<http://twitter.com/saskhistory>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-glam mailing list
> open-glam at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-glam
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-glam
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-glam mailing list
> open-glam at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-glam
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-glam
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-glam mailing list
> open-glam at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-glam
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-glam