[OpenGLAM] content trafficking
Stefano Costa
steko at iosa.it
Tue Sep 10 16:19:14 UTC 2013
That's a correct distinction IMHO. #1 is more or less what happens in
e.g. Italy (even when #2 is not feasible or pursued).
-steko
Il 10/09/2013 17:14, Maarten Brinkerink ha scritto:
>
> 1. Institutions putting restrictions on the access and reuse of their
> PD works.
> 2. Institutions reusing their PD works themselves in manners that add
> value and/or provide a service (and charging people for that service).
>
> I may be overlooking some nuances, but as long as the institutions
> isn't involved with behavior 1, I personally have no problem with
> behavior 2. Quite the opposite actually. As long as other third
> parties are able to do the same.
More information about the open-glam
mailing list