[OpenGLAM] content trafficking

Tue Sep 10 17:10:38 UTC 2013

Also +1 to Maarten's distinction. Maybe a Google doc or some such to begin
identifying such trafficking, then an OpenGLAM-sponsored site? I'm willing
to help set up the doc.

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Stefano Costa <steko at iosa.it> wrote:

> That's a correct distinction IMHO. #1 is more or less what happens in
> e.g. Italy (even when #2 is not feasible or pursued).
>
> -steko
>
> Il 10/09/2013 17:14, Maarten Brinkerink ha scritto:
> >
> > 1. Institutions putting restrictions on the access and reuse of their
> > PD works.
> > 2. Institutions reusing their PD works themselves in manners that add
> > value and/or provide a service (and charging people for that service).
> >
> > I may be overlooking some nuances, but as long as the institutions
> > isn't involved with behavior 1, I personally have no problem with
> > behavior 2. Quite the opposite actually. As long as other third
> > parties are able to do the same.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-glam mailing list
> open-glam at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-glam
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-glam
>

-- 
Tod Robbins
Digital Asset Manager, MLIS
todrobbins.com | @todrobbins <http://www.twitter.com/#!/todrobbins>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-glam/attachments/20130910/954c6fc1/attachment-0001.html>