[open-government] Socrata Open Data Standards - Your Thoughts?

• Previous message: [open-government] Open Government Data and the complexity of administrative divisions
• Next message: [open-government] Socrata Open Data Standards - Your Thoughts?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Greetings all;

I would love to hear your thoughts about these proposed standards?

I see Open Geospatial Consortium, linked data ideals and DOI, data and
preservation and infrastructure as missing.  But I do not know enough to
know if those matter in this context.

It would be good to hear from science, libraries, archives and so on these
matters.  I am concerned that data preservation, dissemination and
management practices as seen in CODATA, GEOSS, GSDI, ICPRS, OGC and IASSIST
and others.  Also, that groups are not overlapping much.  More so, these
principles and standards might become the norm, and they may negatively
influence data policy if not done well at the beginning.

Sincerely
Tracey

-- 
Tracey P. Lauriault
Post Doctoral Fellow
Geomatics and Cartographic Research Centre
https://gcrc.carleton.ca/confluence/display/GCRCWEB/Lauriault
http://datalibre.ca/
613-234-2805
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-government/attachments/20121115/c04eecdc/attachment.html>

• Previous message: [open-government] Open Government Data and the complexity of administrative divisions
• Next message: [open-government] Socrata Open Data Standards - Your Thoughts?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]