[open-government] how to evaluate open data?

Mon Oct 20 20:47:57 UTC 2014

Hello Tomoaki,

We had a workshop earlier in the year at the GovLab at NYU which looked at
different existing assessment methods for open data. The reports linked
here:
http://www.opendataresearch.org/content/2014/646/towards-common-methods-assessing-open-data-workshop-report
include a list of the different examples of open data assessment we
identified, and also proposes a framework for cross-mapping other
assessment efforts.

Hope this is useful,

All the best

Tim

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Tomoaki Watanabe <
tomoaki.watanabe at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello.
>
> I wonder if there is any government setting clear criteria or KPI for
> evaluation of their
> open data policy implementation and effects. Is there any discussion on
> what kind of
> indicators are good to evaluate how well open data is execued and benefits
> generated?
>
> I do know Open Data Census, Barometer, etc. G8 Open Data Charter has some
> specific
> goals set. Anything else I should be aware of?
>
> I am currently on a research project examining, among other things, how to
> evaluate
> open data implementation and effects. I am sure this question came up in
> some of your
> mind from time to time. So any advise or piece of information would be
> appreciated.
>
> Best,
>
> Tomo
> ----
> Tomoaki Watababe, Ph.D.
>  OKFJapan /CC Japan/ GLOCOM
> ----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-government mailing list
> open-government at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-government
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-government
>
>

-- 

w: http://www.timdavies.org.uk | m: 07834 856 303 | twitter: timdavies

Co-director of Practical Participation:
http://www.practicalparticipation.co.uk
--------------------------
Practical Participation Ltd is a registered company in England and Wales -
#5381958.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-government/attachments/20141020/3aecb563/attachment-0003.html>