[Open-science-nl] estafette vs NL_Wetenschap

[Egon Willighagen]

On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 1:14 PM Sondervan, J. (Jeroen) <J.Sondervan at uu.nl>
wrote:

> Sounds like a good plan. And more concrete in terms of actions and learn
> from daily practices.
>

Exactly. This is what I had originally in mind for the Estefette too.


> Only researchers? Or others involved in the subject as well?
>

Anyone actively doing (a bit of) open research; as long as it contributes
to research (or improve research output), it works for me.


> I think tweeting in Dutch (preference but not restricted) could work to
> get a broader readership and therefore
>
create a broader discussion in the Netherlands (researchers, staff, policy
> makers, politicians, etc. etc...)
>

Good point: focus on the audience. I asked, because it was a thing at the
#plansnl meeting last week. After all, many open scientists working in NL
are not native Dutch speakers.

Egon

-- 
Hi, do you like citation networks? Already 51% of all citations are
available <https://i4oc.org/> available for innovative new uses
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/acs2ioc>. Join me in asking the American
Chemical Society to join the Initiative for Open Citations too
<https://www.change.org/p/asking-the-american-chemical-society-to-join-the-initiative-for-open-citations>.
SpringerNature,
the RSC and many others already did <https://i4oc.org/#publishers>.

-----
E.L. Willighagen
Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: https://www.zotero.org/egonw
ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286>
ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/u/egonwillighagen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science-nl/attachments/20190204/6c0f8e33/attachment-0002.html>