[Open-science-nl] Open Science Feedback to cOAlition S

Thu Feb 7 20:51:46 UTC 2019

Hi all,

if you were planning on reading the proposal, please do and ideally before
tomorrow morning noon CET, as I have to submit the Feedback to cOAlition S
in the afternoon.

Thanks to everyone who already did! We're close to reaching 100 signatures,
making it hard to cOAlition S to ignore (I think :) The list of names is
pretty impressive, and covers some 23 countries.

Egon

On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 5:33 PM Egon Willighagen <egon.willighagen at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> Very soon the deadline is for providing feedback to cOAlition S on their
> Guidance for Plan S. As was clear from the meeting in Utrecht, there is
> plenty of feedback on business models, APCs, etc.
>
> However, there is not a lot of feedback from an Open Science side. Of
> course, Plan S is about Open Access, but we cannot forget that OA is only a
> small part of Open Science, and that Open Science is the real goal.
>
> So, I started writing up my comments, and with the help from various
> people (Jon, Lisa, Stuart, others), I now have my feedback to cOAlition S
> ready, focusing on the Open Science side of things. For example, by putting
> focus on the three open research freedoms.
>
> If you also think Open Science is at least as important, if not more
> important, as Open Access, please read and co-sign our feedback to the
> coalition. If only they do not get sidetracked to discussions about who
> pays for making science better:
>
> https://goo.gl/forms/jq6ZmnRnjHKBbyCT2
>
> Please do spread this form and/or my blog post [0] to get as many
> supporters as possible before the Wednesday deadline.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Egon
>
> 0.
> https://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/2019/02/plan-s-and-open-science-community.html
>
> --
> Hi, do you like citation networks? Already 51% of all citations are
> available <https://i4oc.org/> available for innovative new uses
> <https://twitter.com/hashtag/acs2ioc>. Join me in asking the American
> Chemical Society to join the Initiative for Open Citations too
> <https://www.change.org/p/asking-the-american-chemical-society-to-join-the-initiative-for-open-citations>. SpringerNature,
> the RSC and many others already did <https://i4oc.org/#publishers>.
>
> -----
> E.L. Willighagen
> Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
> Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
> Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
> Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
> PubList: https://www.zotero.org/egonw
> ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286>
> ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/u/egonwillighagen
>

-- 
Hi, do you like citation networks? Already 51% of all citations are
available <https://i4oc.org/> available for innovative new uses
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/acs2ioc>. Join me in asking the American
Chemical Society to join the Initiative for Open Citations too
<https://www.change.org/p/asking-the-american-chemical-society-to-join-the-initiative-for-open-citations>.
SpringerNature,
the RSC and many others already did <https://i4oc.org/#publishers>.

-----
E.L. Willighagen
Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: https://www.zotero.org/egonw
ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286>
ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/u/egonwillighagen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science-nl/attachments/20190207/a9cf62f3/attachment-0002.html>