[Open-science-nl] Open Science Feedback to cOAlition S

[Sander van der Waal]

Hi Egon and Jon,

Great initiative and I signed the form just now. I wanted to add two
comments / points for discussion:

- One piece of feedback we often had over the years on the term 'Open
Science' was that those in eg. the Humanities felt this didn't apply to
them. Mostly because of the distinction between the 'sciences' and
'humanities' which is stronger in English terminology than eg in Dutch -
where you could talk about 'open wetenschap'. Have you considered a move to
advocating about a more inclusive umbrella term like 'Open Research'?

- You make a point (7) about licensing; this is where we would reference
the Open Definition (http://opendefinition.org/ ) as a way of defining
whether or not a license is 'open'. It includes BY and SA clauses, but not
NC/ND. Would this form a good basis on what to advocate for?

Sorry if I'm a little late to the party - have been on holiday until today.

Best, Sander

*Sander van der Waal Head of Programmes  |  @sandervdwaal
<https://twitter.com/sandervdwaal>    |   +31615062051*





*Open Knowledge International <http://okfn.org/>Empowering through Open
Knowledgehttp://okfn.org/ <http://okfn.org/>  |  @okfn
<http://twitter.com/OKFN>  |   <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork>Blog
<http://blog.okfn.org/>  *


On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 21:52, Egon Willighagen <egon.willighagen at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> if you were planning on reading the proposal, please do and ideally before
> tomorrow morning noon CET, as I have to submit the Feedback to cOAlition S
> in the afternoon.
>
> Thanks to everyone who already did! We're close to reaching 100
> signatures, making it hard to cOAlition S to ignore (I think :) The list of
> names is pretty impressive, and covers some 23 countries.
>
> Egon
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 5:33 PM Egon Willighagen <
> egon.willighagen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Very soon the deadline is for providing feedback to cOAlition S on their
>> Guidance for Plan S. As was clear from the meeting in Utrecht, there is
>> plenty of feedback on business models, APCs, etc.
>>
>> However, there is not a lot of feedback from an Open Science side. Of
>> course, Plan S is about Open Access, but we cannot forget that OA is only a
>> small part of Open Science, and that Open Science is the real goal.
>>
>> So, I started writing up my comments, and with the help from various
>> people (Jon, Lisa, Stuart, others), I now have my feedback to cOAlition S
>> ready, focusing on the Open Science side of things. For example, by putting
>> focus on the three open research freedoms.
>>
>> If you also think Open Science is at least as important, if not more
>> important, as Open Access, please read and co-sign our feedback to the
>> coalition. If only they do not get sidetracked to discussions about who
>> pays for making science better:
>>
>> https://goo.gl/forms/jq6ZmnRnjHKBbyCT2
>>
>> Please do spread this form and/or my blog post [0] to get as many
>> supporters as possible before the Wednesday deadline.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Egon
>>
>> 0.
>> https://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/2019/02/plan-s-and-open-science-community.html
>>
>> --
>> Hi, do you like citation networks? Already 51% of all citations are
>> available <https://i4oc.org/> available for innovative new uses
>> <https://twitter.com/hashtag/acs2ioc>. Join me in asking the American
>> Chemical Society to join the Initiative for Open Citations too
>> <https://www.change.org/p/asking-the-american-chemical-society-to-join-the-initiative-for-open-citations>. SpringerNature,
>> the RSC and many others already did <https://i4oc.org/#publishers>.
>>
>> -----
>> E.L. Willighagen
>> Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
>> Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
>> Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
>> Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
>> PubList: https://www.zotero.org/egonw
>> ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286>
>> ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/u/egonwillighagen
>>
>
>
> --
> Hi, do you like citation networks? Already 51% of all citations are
> available <https://i4oc.org/> available for innovative new uses
> <https://twitter.com/hashtag/acs2ioc>. Join me in asking the American
> Chemical Society to join the Initiative for Open Citations too
> <https://www.change.org/p/asking-the-american-chemical-society-to-join-the-initiative-for-open-citations>. SpringerNature,
> the RSC and many others already did <https://i4oc.org/#publishers>.
>
> -----
> E.L. Willighagen
> Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
> Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
> Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
> Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
> PubList: https://www.zotero.org/egonw
> ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286>
> ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/u/egonwillighagen
> _______________________________________________
> Open-science-nl mailing list
> Open-science-nl at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science-nl
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science-nl/attachments/20190211/da813e87/attachment-0002.html>