[open-science] text-mining licence exemplar

[anthony at beckhome.info]

Not my call, but I can ask the theme editor.

Thanks

A

> Can you shame them at least into doing the opposite? NON-open for six
> months, then release under CC BY after that embargo elapses?
>
> -- Mike.
>
>
> On 6 June 2012 14:15,  <anthony at beckhome.info> wrote:
>> The irony of this situation is not lost on any of us. Amazingly T&F can
>> not be shamed into doing the 'right thing'. However, in this instance
>> the
>> need for the message for the community is as important as the
>> principles......
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> A
>>
>>> On 6 June 2012 14:07,  <anthony at beckhome.info> wrote:
>>>> Thanks Mike and Ross,
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately Taylor and Francis are not going to go for any form of
>>>> CC
>>>> licence.
>>>>
>>>> The texts in this issues will be made available for 6 months and then
>>>> revert to T&Fs normal terms and conditions. What I want to do is to
>>>> allow
>>>> text mining of the papers for at least that 6 month period and
>>>> potentially
>>>> in perpetuity. Hence, I want/need some clause that specifically allows
>>>> text mining.
>>>
>>> That is not any part of an "open archaeology" theme.
>>>
>>> If you want an "open for text-mining for six months, then paywalled"
>>> licence, you'll have to write one yourself, for the very good reason
>>> that no-one else has done anything that silly.
>>>
>>> Sorry if that reply is unhelpful, but it's the truth. Criticism aimed
>>> not at you, of course, but at T&F.
>>>
>>> -- Mike.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>>
>