[open-science] data repository primer?

[Susanna-Assunta Sansone]

Hi all,
if you go here http://www.biosharing.org/standards_view and query (top 
right box) for *imaging *you will see few results.
BioSharing catalogue is work in progress, so bear with us, but we keep 
adding (community) standards and improves searches and classifications 
also in collaboration with the BioPortal team.
Thanks,
Susanna

--
Susanna-Assunta Sansone, PhD
skype: susanna-a.sansone
uk.linkedin.com/in/sasansone

University of Oxford e-Research Centre
Principal Investigator, Team Leader
www.isacommons.org|www.biosharing.org

Nature Publishing Group
Consultant, Data Products
--

On 17/10/2012 14:57, Rafael Pezzi wrote:
> It seems to me that there is no standard yet. Perhaps some 
> standardization for open data in science may be needed.
>
> Health sciences have defined a standard for handling, storing, 
> printing, and transmitting information in medical imaging. It is 
> called DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine - see 
> wikipedia <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DICOM>). It defines several 
> data modalities, e.g. Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Magnetic 
> Resonance, Mammography.
>
> I am wondering if DICOM could be used as a starting point to a broader 
> science application. In this case, modalities should be defined for 
> each measurement technique, with data stored along with metadata in 
> packages.
>
>
> Em 16-10-2012 23:26, Tom Roche escreveu:
>> Please point me toward one or more short introductions, for a computational and scientific audience, to current options for data sharing and archiving. Why I ask:
>>
>> I attended a conference today for users and developers of an atmospheric model. Mostly it was presentations of research results, but we also had a long general meeting about the model, its development, and (mostly) the need for related tools and infrastructures. One topic was the need for better data sharing and management: we currently tend to physically ship a lot of physical hard drives after searching our social networks for folks with needed datasets. One response is to start a torrent network, but we also need ways/places to archive (preferably searchably). I gave a quick OTTOMH talk about some repository options which I'm aware (pangaea.de, figshare.com, thedatahub.org) and gave props to OKF.
>>
>> I'd like to follow that up with pointers to more information (seed the discussion, to continue the torrent metaphor :-) and would appreciate your advice regarding appropriate sources of information on the topic. (Evangelism is OK too: while definitely international, this is a mostly-US group which is generally unexposed to open-science norms.)
>>
>> TIA, Tom Roche<Tom_Roche at pobox.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> -------------------------------------
>> Prof. Rafael P. Pezzi
>> Instituto de Física - UFRGS
>> Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500 - Agronomia
>> Caixa Postal 15051, CEP 91501-970
>> Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
>> Fone: 51 3308 6444
>> -------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20121017/62919885/attachment-0001.html>