[open-science] data repository primer?

[Stacy Konkiel]

I'd also like to point your attention to the Research Data Alliance
(http://www.rd-alliance.org/), which is a _very_ new international
advisory group being formed to create standards that can help with not
only sharing data openly, but enabling more interdisciplinary
research.

Stacy Konkiel
E-Science Librarian
Indiana University

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Susanna-Assunta Sansone
<sa.sansone at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> if you go here http://www.biosharing.org/standards_view and query (top right
> box) for imaging you will see few results.
> BioSharing catalogue is work in progress, so bear with us, but we keep
> adding (community) standards and improves searches and classifications also
> in collaboration with the BioPortal team.
> Thanks,
> Susanna
>
> --
> Susanna-Assunta Sansone, PhD
> skype: susanna-a.sansone
> uk.linkedin.com/in/sasansone
>
> University of Oxford e-Research Centre
> Principal Investigator, Team Leader
> www.isacommons.org|www.biosharing.org
>
> Nature Publishing Group
> Consultant, Data Products
> --
>
> On 17/10/2012 14:57, Rafael Pezzi wrote:
>
> It seems to me that there is no standard yet. Perhaps some standardization
> for open data in science may be needed.
>
> Health sciences have defined a standard for handling, storing, printing, and
> transmitting information in medical imaging. It is called DICOM (Digital
> Imaging and Communications in Medicine - see wikipedia). It defines several
> data modalities, e.g. Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Magnetic
> Resonance, Mammography.
>
> I am wondering if DICOM could be used as a starting point to a broader
> science application. In this case, modalities should be defined for each
> measurement technique, with data stored along with metadata in packages.
>
>
> Em 16-10-2012 23:26, Tom Roche escreveu:
>
> Please point me toward one or more short introductions, for a computational
> and scientific audience, to current options for data sharing and archiving.
> Why I ask:
>
> I attended a conference today for users and developers of an atmospheric
> model. Mostly it was presentations of research results, but we also had a
> long general meeting about the model, its development, and (mostly) the need
> for related tools and infrastructures. One topic was the need for better
> data sharing and management: we currently tend to physically ship a lot of
> physical hard drives after searching our social networks for folks with
> needed datasets. One response is to start a torrent network, but we also
> need ways/places to archive (preferably searchably). I gave a quick OTTOMH
> talk about some repository options which I'm aware (pangaea.de,
> figshare.com, thedatahub.org) and gave props to OKF.
>
> I'd like to follow that up with pointers to more information (seed the
> discussion, to continue the torrent metaphor :-) and would appreciate your
> advice regarding appropriate sources of information on the topic.
> (Evangelism is OK too: while definitely international, this is a mostly-US
> group which is generally unexposed to open-science norms.)
>
> TIA, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche at pobox.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>
>
> --
>
> -------------------------------------
> Prof. Rafael P. Pezzi
> Instituto de Física - UFRGS
> Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500 - Agronomia
> Caixa Postal 15051, CEP 91501-970
> Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
> Fone: 51 3308 6444
> -------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>