[open-science] Planet Open Science

[Jack Park]

Svetlana,

I see that you have a vote. Can you articulate your reasons for that vote?
Is there a working hypothesis at play here?

Are tags and categories the only criteria for choosing?

What about signal-to-noise ratio? How does the platform support honest,
civil debate about topics?  For that matter, how does it make specific
topics findable? relatable?

Does it simply aggregate, or does it provide for organizing resources?

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Svetlana Belkin <belkinsa at ubuntu.com>
wrote:

> On 10/01/2014 02:40 PM, Jack Park wrote:
> > Can you decide on what you are using prior to knowing what you want to
> > do with it?
>
> Sorry, I got lost in the various suggestions that were in the thread.
> My vote is on Planet and there is a way to separating tags/categories:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlanetUbuntu#Separating_Content
>
> I didn't look for the official Planet Planet guide on this though.
> --
> Svetlana Belkin
> A.K.A: belkinsa
> User Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/belkinsa
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20141001/631ad663/attachment-0003.html>