[open-science] Open Science Anthology published

Emanuil Tolev emanuil at cottagelabs.com
Sun Jan 19 12:36:34 UTC 2014


Discrimination based on field of endeavour I thought was the problem.

Even if some copyright exceptions allow use in situations in which the
license didn't *intend* to allow such use, the license still discriminates
based on the type of activity ("field of endeavour") - doesn't allow
commercial use.

The legal ability to use something for commercial reasons and being told
not to by the license are two separate things, though obviously related.
Being told not to by the license makes it a non-open license according to
OKD.

This isn't to say non-commercial licenses are evil in all situations, I
can't pass that judgement. But if you use a non-commercial clause, you
certainly can't call the thing "open access" - it's accessible to some part
of the population, but it is not "open". Like this anthology (which by the
way looks like it's quite nice).

Greetings,
Emanuil

On Sunday, 19 January 2014, Pal Lykkja <lykkja at gmail.com> wrote:

> What is the problem with CC-NC if it will be possible to reuse like TDM
> throught copyright exceptions that EU are working for?
>
> Pål Lykkja
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'pm286 at cam.ac.uk');>
> > wrote:
>
>> Sounds useful.
>>
>> One comment. CC-NC is not Open Access under BOAI- and OKD- definitions.
>> I'd urge you to make the book CC-BY. If there are reasons that you can't do
>> this, please drop the term "Open Access" and call it "free-of-charge".
>> CC-NC forbids many forms of redistribution and re-use
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Ulrich Herb <u.herb at scinoptica.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'u.herb at scinoptica.com');>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Dear lists,
>>>
>>> perhaps this might be of interest: Yesterday an anthology on Open
>>> Science was published: "Opening Science - The Evolving Guide on How the
>>> Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing". It
>>> has been edited by Sönke Bartling from the German Cancer Research Center in
>>> Heidelberg and  Sascha Friesike, researcher at the Alexander von Humboldt
>>> Institute in Berlin. The anthology knows four manifestations: it is
>>> available as a printed book,  as an Open Access e-Book or PDF collection
>>> under a CC BY-NC license, and as an editable living document via Github.
>>> for further information please visit:
>>> http://www.openingscience.org/get-the-book/
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Ulrich Herb
>>>
>>> --
>>> scinoptica science consulting and publishing consulting
>>> POB 10 13 13
>>> D-66013 Saarbrücken
>>> Germany
>>> http://www.scinoptica.com/pages/en/start.php
>>> +49-(0)157 30306851
>>> http://twitter.com/#!/scinoptica
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Diese E-Mail ist frei von Viren und Malware, denn der avast! Antivirus
>>> Schutz ist aktiv.
>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> open-access mailing list
>>> open-access at lists.okfn.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>>> 'open-access at lists.okfn.org');>
>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-access
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Peter Murray-Rust
>> Reader in Molecular Informatics
>> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
>> University of Cambridge
>> CB2 1EW, UK
>> +44-1223-763069
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-access mailing list
>> open-access at lists.okfn.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'open-access at lists.okfn.org');>
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-access
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20140119/d0c8c955/attachment.html>


More information about the open-science mailing list