[open-science] Open Science and Open Education

[Daniel Mietchen]

I agree that it would be useful to mention open tools more explicitly
(open code is discussed).

It's not clear to me yet what the intended audience for the original
essay was, nor what it could be for a revised version. Once that is
clarified, I think it would be much easier to shape the piece
accordingly. I left some more specific comments in the document.
d.
--
http://www.naturkundemuseum-berlin.de/en/institution/mitarbeiter/mietchen-daniel/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Publications
http://okfn.org
http://wikimedia.org


On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Rafael Pezzi <rafael.pezzi at ufrgs.br> wrote:
> Dear Jenny,
>
> I am really interested in this topic very aligned with your essay. By the
> way, the principles that you point at, particularly aligning open science
> and open education though environment-minded citizen science is the core of
> our project on open weather stations in at the university in partnership
> with local schools.
>
> One point that I would add is the need of open tools for open science and
> open education. I consider these tools the basic infrastructure for
> effective open knowledge sharing. I believe some development is needed, for
> more information see these two pages related pages concerning CAD and
> digital fabrication tools that I have started: [1] and [2]. These would have
> great impact on open science and open education and their integration.
>
> How about including a section on open tools in your essay?
>
> Regards,
> Rafael
>
> [1] -
> https://pt.wikiversity.org/wiki/Pesquisa:Ferramentas_livres:Work_group_for_development_of_open_workbench
> [2] -
> https://pt.wikiversity.org/wiki/Pesquisa:Ferramentas_livres:Desenvolvimento_de_CAD_Livre:en
>
> Em 16-09-2014 06:39, Jenny Molloy escreveu:
>
> Hi All
>
> I recently drafted a piece on open science and open education for a teaching
> portfolio, with a focus on under- and postgraduate level teaching.
>
> It was for a specific purpose but I thought others might be interested in
> taking a look, all contributions are welcome and it's public domain. Maybe
> some of you would be interested in helping expand it to a full and useful
> review!
>
> https://www.writelatex.com/1458762xxhqzz [could have transferred to
> googledocs/etherpad but this is editable and saved me reformatting - happy
> to move it if people prefer]
>
> I'm seeing a lot of activity around the best ways to train students and
> other early career researchers about open science and wondered who on this
> list is specifically interested in this area? My list includes:
>
> Sophie Kay and the OSTI programme
> FOSTER
> Mozilla Science Lab & Software Carpentry
> Finland´s Doctoral Schools
>
> I'm at a three day workshop on open and reproducible science in biology
> (#orb14) so this has been on my mind as training keeps coming up!
>
> Thoughts to the list on some of the training initiatives around open science
> and use of open science in teaching, feel free to weigh in with comments and
> contributions to the piece if interested.
>
> Jenny
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>