[open-science] [okfn-discuss] Community Integration?: Afterthoughts
jackpark at gmail.com
Fri Oct 10 15:27:19 UTC 2014
A pad might make sense.
I'd like to toss in an idea that builds on Jenny's "map of the
participants" by adding a "map of the topics they share" (a topic map,
which includes people, their topics, and relations among all of them).
Topics could easily be extended to include projects, lab notebooks, data,
and even software.
If a particular software becomes a topic in a topic map, it can then be
connected to its users, projects using it, data it processed, reports
generated by the work, and so forth.
If the topic map also happens to include topics each of which is a
question, claim, or argument from conversations around projects, then the
entire map contains all that is knowable to it as generated by the
If a topic happens to be a biomolecule under study, then, in effect, the
topic map grants a social life to that molecule.
Just a thought.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Svetlana Belkin <belkinsa at ubuntu.com>
> On 10/10/2014 07:58 AM, Jenny Molloy wrote:
> > Open science are definitely keen - how about a meta-community sprint
> > next week? I can spend some focused time on this and we can explore
> > different ideas and try out things from the list of suggestions on the
> > open-science thread you've linked.
> Sure, but how are we going to do this? IRC and Pad? Or Skype and Pad?
> Reply to this message:
> And [SNIP] part of this reply is here:
> Svetlana Belkin
> A.K.A: belkinsa
> User Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/belkinsa
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the open-science