[openbiblio-dev] future development and names of things
pm286 at cam.ac.uk
Wed Aug 24 07:03:22 UTC 2011
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Jim Pitman <pitman at stat.berkeley.edu>wrote:
> Nice account, thanks Mark
> > * bibliographica.org or bibsoup.net?
> I think bibsoup is a nice catchall for the entirety of open data we can map
> BibJSON. The bibsoup could be incrementally structured in various ways, to
> show things like personal bibs, library collections, journal runs, ... all
> under the
> same roof. The scale of this may be hard to control and we may hit
> unexpected obstacles
> to rapid growth. So I am reluctant to see too big a commitment to
> containing/indexing all the
> data we can open up. OAISTER is a cautionary tale.
> Thanks Jim,
It's important to stress that bibsoup is not just another way of recasting
FRBR/BIBO etc (referee 2 hinted that we would run into all the same
problems). The key thing is that Bibsoup is aimed at creating an ecology of
communities - not an uberschema. Its success will depend on the ability of
local implementers to make their pot of soup compatible with their
neighbours - not necessarily the whole world. A community can agree to keep
things simple - a spec can't.
The *soup idea has elements of popular culture -
* food/drink metaphor like Java, jars
* everyday language like python, spam, eggs, etc.
* examples, like TeX Gnus, gnats, etc.
I think it would be a great idea to get some cartoons drawn (thinking of
TeX) Not my forte, but we should be able to get something by appealing to
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openbiblio-dev