[wsfii-discuss] Europe's GeoData belongs to the public?

[Malcolm Matson]

Hi Tracy - it's not my speciality but has anyone looked at this important
issue from the standpoint of the UK 'Freedom of Information Act
2000<http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/20000036.htm>'?
Might be worth it.
Regards (from Pakistan where I am with Vickram and colleagues)

Malcolm




THE *OPLAN* FOUNDATION

*Malcolm J Matson*

77 Andrewes House, London EC2Y 8AY, UK
tel. +44(0) 20 7638 2344 : mob. +44(0) 7977-407845
malcolm.matson at oplan.org

...............................................................

Privileged or confidential information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer does not consent to internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of OPLAN Foundation shall be understood as
neither given nor endorsed by it.





On 14/11/06, Tracey P. Lauriault <tlauriau at magma.ca> wrote:
>
>  A few people at WSFII Dharamsala asked me about access to Geographic Data
> (e.g. maps, census, environment data & maps, radar images, satellite
> images, air photos etc.) for their countries and cities in Europe.
>
> These data are hard to access for a number of reasons and I would like to
> point you to an important what is happening in Europe that will eventually
> determine how all European Member Nations address issues of access and cost
> of these important civic data sets.  The UK position on full cost recovery
> is the worst and it is influencing others.  If you want *open and free -
> as in no cost - access to the GeoData your national governments collect with
> your tax dollars, and you do not want to pay for it twice - i recommend you
> act on the following:*
> Open GeoData - http://publicgeodata.org/
>
> On 23 January 2006, the Council of European Union has formally adopted a
> common position on the Inspire Directive, which stipulates that *Geographic
> Data collected by National Mapping Agencies all over Europe should be owned
> by such agencies and not by the Public*
>
> *The Open Knowledge Foundation Open Data Manifesto -
> http://okfn.org/geo/manifesto.php*
>
> Geodata is a public good. Open access to it, under a 'Commons'
> (ShareAlike) license, is the best way to see its full benefits realized by
> industry and citizens. At the same time such an arrangement, by requiring
> users to redistribute updates and improvements to the data, promises to
> deliver more and better data for less.
>
> *Free Our Data : The Blog* - http://www.freeourdata.org.uk/blog/
>
> Free Our Data is the campaign started by Guardian Technology<http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/>beginning with the article Give
> us back our crown jewels<http://www.guardian.co.uk/Technology/weekly/story/0,,1726229,00.html>.
> The argument is simple: by charging for data that is collected (sometimes
> with the force of law) by government-owned bodies, the government is holding
> back the growth in public and private use of that data which could benefit
> the UK overall. That is, a short-term "gain" hides a much bigger loss in
> terms of entrepreneurship, jobs created and competitive edge lost.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsfii-discuss mailing list
> wsfii-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/wsfii-discuss
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/wsfii-discuss/attachments/20061114/3e358c7e/attachment.html>