[kforge-dev] KForge Routes issues

[Rufus Pollock]

What exactly is the failure? I could take a look at routing around the
problem ...

Rufus

2009/4/15 John Bywater <john.bywater at appropriatesoftware.net>:
> Hi Rufus,
>
> Just wonderin' whether or not you're planning to fix the KForge code for
> the Routes issues mentioned below? If not, I could have a go.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> John.
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [kforge-dev] Debian packages
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:22:54 +0000
> From: John Bywater <john.bywater at appropriatesoftware.net>
> To: Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey at gmail.com>
> References:
> <ba4215e10803121659t76d4e0fdif3abb22e9fd902d3 at mail.gmail.com>
> <49CA53A5.90806 at appropriatesoftware.net>
> <ba4215e10903260304l1902d6f3sbcea2fd6c35bb415 at mail.gmail.com>
>
> Hey Martin,
>
> Thanks for your reply. Would be nice to have it in the Debian distribution.
> Thanks for your considerations of the packaging issues. I would be
> interested to make a list of the potential security issues.
>
> Lenny ships Routes 1.9.2, but KForge still has an issue with it. I've got
> some tests to deploy and test KForge with a range of versions of its
> dependencies. I found that:
>
> KForge's unit tests pass with these version of Routes:
> 1.10.3
> 1.10.2
> 1.10.1
> 1.8
> 1.7.3
> 1.7.2
>
> KForge's unit tests fail with these version of Routes:
> 1.9.2
> 1.9.1
> 1.9
> 1.7
> 1.7.1
>
> I don't care about the early versions of 1.7, but the 1.9 series is
> important. Intersting that it works with 1.10 and 1.8 but not with 1.9. I'm
> sure we can sort it out...
>
> I'll also have to get back to you about the upgrade routine!
>
> Best wishes,
>
> John.
>
>
>
>