[kforge-dev] Converting to mercurial
John Bywater
john.bywater at appropriatesoftware.net
Wed Sep 9 10:36:40 UTC 2009
I'm sure we can discuss it further, but it appears to me that none of
needing to work online, branching trouble, or processing patches appear
to be limiting factors of KForge/DomainModel development. ?
At the same time, from my point of view, there are a number of other
DomainModel applications, all of which at the moment use Subversion.
I've written some code to direct the development/release cycle, with svn
commands in various places. So it would be a minor PITA to code in
exceptions for two projects. However that in itself isn't an argument
for avoiding change.
Another consideration is your "eat your own dog food" thing. :-) If we
don't use KForge's Subversion plugin, how will we know when it's broken?
J.
Rufus Pollock wrote:
> I'd like to suggest converting our existing svn repo to mercurial.
>
> I've switched many other OKF projects to mercurial over the last 6-12
> months and found it very convenient (offline support, ease of
> branching, pushing and pulling patches etc).
>
> Rufus
More information about the kforge-dev
mailing list