[od-discuss] UK OGL Compliant?

Mike Linksvayer ml at creativecommons.org
Mon Feb 13 21:56:27 UTC 2012


On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Herb Lainchbury
<herb at dynamic-solutions.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks.  How do we move forward on this?   Is there a board that needs to
> vote?

I don't know about final approval, which I imagine might be the OKFN
board, but there is an Open Definition advisory group that I think
I've cc'd here and obviously should be consulted (but it may be
everyone is on both lists) -- for context see this subject in
Dec/Jan/Feb od-discuss archives
http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/

Also it makes sense to have a feedback period, reaching out to, at the
least I'd think

- Stewards/communities of neighboring definitions (OSI, FSF, Debian,
Freedom Defined)
- Stewards/communities of OD-compliant licenses
- Some OKF sub-communities/projects/lists that would be interested

Rufus did mention in
http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/2012-January/000100.html
having some kind of license review meeting, which I think could
conclude in need for definition clarification, or just start with
that. I haven't seen a followup yet.

> Mike, I think that putting it in git is a great idea.  I wonder if a
> markdown version of the license might be a better way to capture content

s/license/definition/ :)

> diffs?  That way the styles are independent of the content and it's easy to
> see what's changed.

I assumed it was being kept in HTML in WordPress, but if a markdown
version is available/being used with a markdown plugin to publish,
clearly that would be better.

Mike

-- 
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:Mike_Linksvayer




More information about the od-discuss mailing list