[od-discuss] Please review: 'Datenlizenz Deutschland' for OD compliance.

Thu Feb 28 21:43:43 UTC 2013

Dear all,

I think we have not followed this up properly:

Can the Advisory council of the Open Definition please review the 2 licenses used for the German federal government data portal [1], which was launched last week.

The original license text is here:

"Datenlizenz Deutschland – Namensnennung – Version 1.0"
https://github.com/fraunhoferfokus/ogd-metadata/blob/master/lizenzen/BMI/Datenlizenz_Deutschland_Namensnennung_V1.md

essentially an attribution license and:

"Datenlizenz Deutschland – Namensnennung – nicht kommerziell – Version 1.0"
https://github.com/fraunhoferfokus/ogd-metadata/blob/master/lizenzen/BMI/Datenlizenz_Deutschland_Namensnennung_nichtkommerziell_V1.md

essentially an attribution non-commercial license.

The english translation is here for you to review and comment:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i9na_ZRmEC-EkQBcvUvwUvevOaMA7pgUUNdgiFxf5B0/edit#

It would be really great if we could evaluate them soon and inform the German Government about OD compliance. Looking fwd hearing your opinions.

Kind regards
Daniel

1. https://www.govdata.de/

On 22 Jan 2013, at 10:36, Daniel Dietrich <daniel.dietrich at okfn.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> here are the actual license texts for the (soon be launched) open government data platform in Germany. 
> 
> There will be two licenses: a attribution-like and a attribution-non-commercial-like - the attribution being the default. Please note that this is the final version of the draft I shared with you before. [1]
> 
> I have pasted into a GDoc so we can comment on it:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i9na_ZRmEC-EkQBcvUvwUvevOaMA7pgUUNdgiFxf5B0/edit#
> 
> Now Dr. Gross from the German ministry of the interior responsible for the licenses is asking the OD Advisory Council for evaluation of the licenses for its compliance with the open definition.
> 
> Of course they understand that the non-commercial version is not an open license so we can focus on the attribution version.
> 
> I would very much appreciate if you all could have a look, please. Thanks. Maybe we could arrange a call on this in the next weeks? 
> 
> All the best
> Daniel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dk68bfuEp8eDsgIDBSZuQAr07_YWnbjvr8s5CEZ-q4o/edit
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: <MariaHelene.Gross at bmi.bund.de>
>> Subject: Datenlizenz Deutschland
>> Date: 22 January 2013 09:09:22 CET
>> To: <daniel.dietrich at okfn.org>
>> Cc: <JanOle.Beyer at bmi.bund.de>
>> 
>> Lieber Herr Dietrich,
>> 
>> anliegend übersende ich Ihnen die englische Fassung der Datenlizenzen
>> Deutschland mit der Bitte, sie an das Advisory Board zur Prüfung
>> weiterzuleiten.
>> 
>> Ich gehe davon aus, dass die "Datenlizenz Deutschland Namensnennung" eine
>> offene Lizenz ist, die "Datenlizenz Deutschland Namensnennung nicht
>> kommerziell" dagegen nicht.
>> 
>> Vielen Dank für Ihre Unterstützung,
>> 
>> 
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen 
>> Dr. Helene Groß 
>> ___________________________ 
>> Bundesministerium des Innern 
>> Referat O 1 
>> Telefon: 030/ 18  681-2324
>> 
>> www.bmi.bund.de
>> www.verwaltung-innovativ.de
>> www.daten-deutschland.de
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> <130121_Data_Licence_Germany.docx>
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Daniel Dietrich
> Open Data evangelist; Open Knowledge Foundation
> Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age
> www.okfn.org - www.opendefinition.org
> 
> www.ddie.me
> twitter.com/ddie
> +49 176 327 685 30
> +49 30 57703666 0
> 