[od-discuss] v2.0dev Review Requested

[Mike Linksvayer]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Aaron Wolf <wolftune at gmail.com> wrote:

> Pull request is up for the change to the summary sentence
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Aaron Wolf <wolftune at gmail.com<mailto:
>> wolftune at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> One more edit. I think "only, at most," reads awkwardly and is excessive.
>> If it is "at most" than obviously other measures are not included. So:
>>
>> "Open Knowledge allows anyone the freedoms to access, use, modify, and
>> share — subject, at most, to measures that preserve provenance and
>> openness."
>>
>
I'm not thrilled with "Open Knowledge" as an actor. I'm all for active
form, but is this accurate? Further, why capital K? The actor clearly is
not Open Knowledge the organization. I think I prefer the "Knowledge is
open if anyone is free...it..." But I don't feel all that strongly.

Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20140731/dcbe7c29/attachment-0003.html>