[od-discuss] Fwd: Conformance - Open Government License - Surrey 1.0

[Aaron Wolf]

Excellently written, thanks.

On 02/06/2015 02:52 PM, Herb Lainchbury wrote:
> As promised, I have delivered the attached Letter of Recommendation to
> the representative in the City of Surrey who is responsible for their
> open data program.  Please see attached email and accompanying letter.
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Herb Lainchbury* <herb at dynamic-solutions.com
> <mailto:herb at dynamic-solutions.com>>
> Date: Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:45 PM
> Subject: Conformance - Open Government License - Surrey 1.0
> To: "Simpson, Sean"
> 
> 
> Dear Mr. Simpson
> 
> I am contacting you today on behalf of the Open Definition Advisory
> Council, regarding a request we received on November 4, 2013 to review
> the Open Government License - Surrey version 1.0 for conformance to the
> Open Definition <http://opendefinition.org/>.
> 
> We feel that the license cannot be considered conformant with the Open
> Definition.
> 
> Please find attached a letter which explains this decision and the
> recommendations of the Open Definition Advisory Council should you wish
> to use a conformant license.
> 
> Thank you for your consideration.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Herb Lainchbury
> Chair, Open Definition Advisory Council
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>