[open-science] Fake Cancer study published in 157 Open Access Journals
pm286 at cam.ac.uk
Tue Oct 8 16:15:45 UTC 2013
Can I suggest we try to avoid personal issues and rather see what we can
collaborate on? If we don't agree , then it's difficult to take communal
action. Collaborative actions - documents, software, protocols, data,
meetings, fact-finding , etc. are one of the very strong points of OKF.
We're not strong in Open Access (despite the hard work TomO put in, for
which thanks) and that's why I think we have to prioritize our actions. And
particularly tackle the issues that others don't.
If anyone wants to bring together a group to write on this issue, make
suggestions now. There's no prior "membership requirement" :-)
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the open-science