[open-science] Open Science and Open Education

[Brent Shambaugh]

Page 1:
On line 1 I am unsure what defintions mean because they have not yet been
introduced.
On line 3 I do not know what OKD means

Page 2:
In the first numbered section, enrollments is misspelled

Page 3:
"However the literature is vast and there is no mechanism widely under
consideration for systematic retrospective verification and demarcation of
reproducibility"  --- this is bold

Page 7:
"Graduate students in particular are enculturated into the norms of their
research lab, which may not reflect their own visions of how scholarship
should be performed but will strongly shape their future working practices"
----I very much agree.

"In extreme cases, it may be more difficult for students to reconcile their
values with their received perception of how to be a scientist and this
risks disengagement and alienation" -- I very much agree.

I am unsure about transition to the next paragraph.



-Brent Shambaugh

Website: bshambaugh.org

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Jenny Molloy <jcmcoppice12 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Daniel
>
> The intended audience was my teaching portfolio assessor and me, to
> demonstrate thinking about innovative teaching methods and how I might
> apply them in the particular subject I teach (which was elaborated in a
> later section that I didn't include).
>
> As for a future audience, I guess I was thinking teachers and course
> planners in higher education settings, but if you think there is another
> group for whom the topic would be useful and interesting then do say.
>
> Thanks for commenting! I'm afraid my next week or two is mostly dedicated
> to thesis writing but I'll try and revisit and address your comments
> shortly - anyone else also feel free to respond or add your own comments.
>
> Jenny
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Daniel Mietchen <
> daniel.mietchen at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree that it would be useful to mention open tools more explicitly
>> (open code is discussed).
>>
>> It's not clear to me yet what the intended audience for the original
>> essay was, nor what it could be for a revised version. Once that is
>> clarified, I think it would be much easier to shape the piece
>> accordingly. I left some more specific comments in the document.
>> d.
>> --
>>
>> http://www.naturkundemuseum-berlin.de/en/institution/mitarbeiter/mietchen-daniel/
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Publications
>> http://okfn.org
>> http://wikimedia.org
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Rafael Pezzi <rafael.pezzi at ufrgs.br>
>> wrote:
>> > Dear Jenny,
>> >
>> > I am really interested in this topic very aligned with your essay. By
>> the
>> > way, the principles that you point at, particularly aligning open
>> science
>> > and open education though environment-minded citizen science is the
>> core of
>> > our project on open weather stations in at the university in partnership
>> > with local schools.
>> >
>> > One point that I would add is the need of open tools for open science
>> and
>> > open education. I consider these tools the basic infrastructure for
>> > effective open knowledge sharing. I believe some development is needed,
>> for
>> > more information see these two pages related pages concerning CAD and
>> > digital fabrication tools that I have started: [1] and [2]. These would
>> have
>> > great impact on open science and open education and their integration.
>> >
>> > How about including a section on open tools in your essay?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Rafael
>> >
>> > [1] -
>> >
>> https://pt.wikiversity.org/wiki/Pesquisa:Ferramentas_livres:Work_group_for_development_of_open_workbench
>> > [2] -
>> >
>> https://pt.wikiversity.org/wiki/Pesquisa:Ferramentas_livres:Desenvolvimento_de_CAD_Livre:en
>> >
>> > Em 16-09-2014 06:39, Jenny Molloy escreveu:
>> >
>> > Hi All
>> >
>> > I recently drafted a piece on open science and open education for a
>> teaching
>> > portfolio, with a focus on under- and postgraduate level teaching.
>> >
>> > It was for a specific purpose but I thought others might be interested
>> in
>> > taking a look, all contributions are welcome and it's public domain.
>> Maybe
>> > some of you would be interested in helping expand it to a full and
>> useful
>> > review!
>> >
>> > https://www.writelatex.com/1458762xxhqzz [could have transferred to
>> > googledocs/etherpad but this is editable and saved me reformatting -
>> happy
>> > to move it if people prefer]
>> >
>> > I'm seeing a lot of activity around the best ways to train students and
>> > other early career researchers about open science and wondered who on
>> this
>> > list is specifically interested in this area? My list includes:
>> >
>> > Sophie Kay and the OSTI programme
>> > FOSTER
>> > Mozilla Science Lab & Software Carpentry
>> > Finland´s Doctoral Schools
>> >
>> > I'm at a three day workshop on open and reproducible science in biology
>> > (#orb14) so this has been on my mind as training keeps coming up!
>> >
>> > Thoughts to the list on some of the training initiatives around open
>> science
>> > and use of open science in teaching, feel free to weigh in with
>> comments and
>> > contributions to the piece if interested.
>> >
>> > Jenny
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > open-science mailing list
>> > open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> > https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > open-science mailing list
>> > open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> > https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20140928/599fec00/attachment-0003.html>