[open-science] Elsevier caught selling articles that should have been open access
William Gunn
william.gunn at gmail.com
Tue Mar 10 20:00:15 UTC 2015
Ok, just wanted to get that out there in response to Peter's assertion that
NC licenses prevent use in teaching.
On Mar 10, 2015 12:55 PM, "Andrés Delgado" <andres at delgado.ec> wrote:
> On 10/03/15 14:53, William Gunn wrote:
> > The point of CC licenses in general are to relieve one of the burden
> > of getting permission, right? So, since the primary use isn't too
> > obtain monetary compensation, one should feel free to use a NC
> > licensed PDF in a classroom without having to ask permission, right?
> Yeap, educational purposes are under fair-use I think, even copyrighted
> material should be fine. But that's just an educated guess
> FYI: https://wiki.creativecommons.org/Defining_Noncommercial
>
> --
> Atentamente,
>
> Andrés Delgado
> http://andres.delgado.ec
> PGP FINGERPRINT
> C697 501C C221 95F7 E803 9A18 5A47 1915 7C6E 1DDC
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20150310/4cea057f/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the open-science
mailing list