[open-science] Open Science Policy Platform - Open Science Working Group Representative
Alexandre Hannud Abdo
abdo at member.fsf.org
Sat Mar 19 18:18:29 UTC 2016
Jenny, how can we best support you?
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Peter Kraker <pkraker at know-center.at>
wrote:
> I agree with the two-sided approach, and I support Jenny as the OK-INT
> candidate. Open Science FTW!
>
> Best,
> Peter
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: open-science [open-science-bounces at lists.okfn.org]" im Auftrag
> von "Daniel Mietchen [daniel.mietchen at googlemail.com]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. März 2016 15:53
> An: open-science at lists.okfn.org
> Betreff: Re: [open-science] Open Science Policy Platform - Open Science
> Working Group Representative
>
> I agree with Konrad's suggestion of a two-sided approach:
> - for the organizational track, let the global OKF propose one candidate -
> Jenny
> - for the individual track, I think a diversity of suitable candidates
> would be good.
>
> I haven't yet gone through all the public candidate posts yet, but I
> have posted one myself (which links to those that I am aware of) and
> encourage others to do so as well:
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/European_Commission_Open_Science_Policy_Platform
> .
>
> According to the selection criteria, they aim to "strike a balance
> within the members of the group in terms of stakeholders represented,
> gender, age and geographical origin", and in this dimension, a range
> of community candidates can complement the organizational candidates
> in a useful fashion.
>
> Cheers,
> d.
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Konrad Förstner <konrad at foerstner.org>
> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Disclaimer: I have never worked on the EU level of politics so please
> > correct me I am wrong.
> >
> > I think Jenny got a lot of support and deadline is soon (already 22nd
> > of March, i.e. next week Tuesday). In order to get people in to the EU
> > Open Science Policy Platform we have to play their game. The call
> > states two ways of applying to become a member of the platform [1]. As
> > individuals or as a representative of a organization. I talked to
> > Julia Reda [2] and she said for such a platform it would be ideal to
> > have a high ranking person representing its organization (the call
> > talks in of a single person per organization as far as I understand
> > [1]). As Jenny is the global coordinator of the Open Science
> > activities of OKFN I suggest that OKFN as an organization is applying
> > and sent her as representative with that title "Global Coordinator
> > Open Science".
> >
> > Besides this we should support individual members of the open science
> > community. There are 20 - 30 slot to fill [1] and it would be a shame
> > if we are not trying to get more of our people into the platform.
> >
> > This is why I would encourage you to apply as individuals like Björn
> > Brembs and Cameron Neylon have done. I myself will apply and would be
> > happy if you could endorse me here:
> >
> >
> http://thedaoofflow.fluxionary.net/2016/03/applying-for-the-european-commission-open-science-policy-platform/
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Konrad
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/call_for_expression_of_interest_-_high_level_advisory_group_ospp.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none
> > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Reda
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri Mar 18, 2016 at 12:20:41AM +0000, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> >>
> >> I have supported Cameron and will support Jenny in the same way.
> >>
> >> The danger with much practice of "Open" - in the academic area and
> >> probably
> >> some way beyond - is that it has lost a lot of its emotional,
> >> philosophical and
> >> cultural roots. It's partly bureaucratic - academics have to do it and
> >> many
> >> hate it - and partly sold as self-interest - you get more citations.
> It's
> >> critical that these misrepresentations don't get into European policy.
> >> That's
> >> why we have to have people who really believe in Open - and can put this
> >> in
> >> their manifestos.
> >>
> >> P.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Cameron Neylon <cn at cameronneylon.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Huh, so it turns out that every email I sent to this list has never
> >> gone
> >> through...odd...
> >>
> >> Anyway, I am planning on applying and have been requesting
> endorsement
> >> as a
> >> possible community representative at:
> >> http://cameronneylon.net/blog/
> >> european-commission-open-science-policy-platform/
> >>
> >> Bjoern Brembs has also got a similar post up:
> >> http://bjoern.brembs.net/2016/03/seeking-your-endorsement/
> >> I’d strongly support Jenny applying as both someone knowledgeable
> and
> >> representative of younger researchers (certainly younger than me).
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Cameron
> >> On Mar 17, 2016, at 9:26 AM, Peter Murray-Rust <
> pm286 at cam.ac.uk>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I will absolutely support Jenny in this. Neelie Kroes always
> >> highlighted the world-changing nature of Early Career
> Researchers.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jenny Molloy
> >> <jenny.molloy at okfn.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Open Science Working Group
> >>
> >> Konrad Förstner suggests we should put forward someone for
> the
> >> EU Open Science Policy Platform.
> >> More info:
> >> https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=
> >> open-science-policy-platform
> >>
> >> This would be a good chance to take forward our views and
> >> interests
> >> at a high level in EU science policy. The nominations need to
> >> be in
> >> next Tuesday so it's a bit last minute!
> >>
> >> I have been considering it and would be happy to put myself
> >> forward, but if anyone else strongly wants to be the
> >> representative
> >> then please let us all know.
> >>
> >> Also, it would be great to get a feeling for who else is
> going
> >> for
> >> this and whether it is looking like there is a good set of
> >> applications from the open community.
> >>
> >> Best wishes
> >> Jenny
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> open-science mailing list
> >> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> >> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> >> Unsubscribe:
> >> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Peter Murray-Rust
> >> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> >> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> >> University of Cambridge
> >> CB2 1EW, UK
> >> +44-1223-763069
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> open-science mailing list
> >> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> >> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
> >>
> >> --
> >> Professor Cameron Neylon
> >> Centre for Culture and Technology
> >> Curtin University, Western Australia
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Peter Murray-Rust
> >> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> >> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> >> University of Cambridge
> >> CB2 1EW, UK
> >> +44-1223-763069
> >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> open-science mailing list
> >> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> >> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > open-science mailing list
> > open-science at lists.okfn.org
> > https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20160319/918b847d/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the open-science
mailing list