[open-science] Open Science Policy Platform - Open Science Working Group Representative

Sat Mar 19 19:15:24 UTC 2016

Yes, I asked this earlier but did not get a reply.

Surely just responding to this email is not sufficient? Do we need to
submit something formally?

On Sat, 19 Mar 2016, 18:18 Alexandre Hannud Abdo, <abdo at member.fsf.org>
wrote:

> Jenny, how can we best support you?
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Peter Kraker <pkraker at know-center.at>
> wrote:
>
>> I agree with the two-sided approach, and I support Jenny as the OK-INT
>> candidate. Open Science FTW!
>>
>> Best,
>> Peter
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> Von: open-science [open-science-bounces at lists.okfn.org]" im Auftrag
>> von "Daniel Mietchen [daniel.mietchen at googlemail.com]
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. März 2016 15:53
>> An: open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> Betreff: Re: [open-science] Open Science Policy Platform - Open Science
>> Working Group Representative
>>
>> I agree with Konrad's suggestion of a two-sided approach:
>> - for the organizational track, let the global OKF propose one candidate
>> - Jenny
>> - for the individual track, I think a diversity of suitable candidates
>> would be good.
>>
>> I haven't yet gone through all the public candidate posts yet, but I
>> have posted one myself (which links to those that I am aware of) and
>> encourage others to do so as well:
>>
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/European_Commission_Open_Science_Policy_Platform
>> .
>>
>> According to the selection criteria, they aim to "strike a balance
>> within the members of the group in terms of stakeholders represented,
>> gender, age and geographical origin", and in this dimension, a range
>> of community candidates can complement the organizational candidates
>> in a useful fashion.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> d.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Konrad Förstner <konrad at foerstner.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > Disclaimer: I have never worked on the EU level of politics so please
>> > correct me I am wrong.
>> >
>> > I think Jenny got a lot of support and deadline is soon (already 22nd
>> > of March, i.e. next week Tuesday). In order to get people in to the EU
>> > Open Science Policy Platform we have to play their game. The call
>> > states two ways of applying to become a member of the platform [1]. As
>> > individuals or as a representative of a organization. I talked to
>> > Julia Reda [2] and she said for such a platform it would be ideal to
>> > have a high ranking person representing its organization (the call
>> > talks in of a single person per organization as far as I understand
>> > [1]).  As Jenny is the global coordinator of the Open Science
>> > activities of OKFN I suggest that OKFN as an organization is applying
>> > and sent her as representative with that title "Global Coordinator
>> > Open Science".
>> >
>> > Besides this we should support individual members of the open science
>> > community. There are 20 - 30 slot to fill [1] and it would be a shame
>> > if we are not trying to get more of our people into the platform.
>> >
>> > This is why I would encourage you to apply as individuals like Björn
>> > Brembs and Cameron Neylon have done. I myself will apply and would be
>> > happy if you could endorse me here:
>> >
>> >
>> http://thedaoofflow.fluxionary.net/2016/03/applying-for-the-european-commission-open-science-policy-platform/
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > Konrad
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/call_for_expression_of_interest_-_high_level_advisory_group_ospp.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none
>> > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Reda
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri Mar 18, 2016 at 12:20:41AM +0000, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have supported Cameron and will support Jenny in the same way.
>> >>
>> >> The  danger with much practice of "Open" - in the academic area and
>> >> probably
>> >> some way beyond - is that it has lost a lot of its emotional,
>> >> philosophical and
>> >> cultural roots. It's partly bureaucratic - academics have to do it and
>> >> many
>> >> hate it - and partly sold as self-interest - you get more citations.
>> It's
>> >> critical that these misrepresentations don't get into European policy.
>> >> That's
>> >> why we have to have people who really believe in Open - and can put
>> this
>> >> in
>> >> their manifestos.
>> >>
>> >> P.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Cameron Neylon <cn at cameronneylon.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>    Huh, so it turns out that every email I sent to this list has never
>> >> gone
>> >>    through...odd...
>> >>
>> >>    Anyway, I am planning on applying and have been requesting
>> endorsement
>> >> as a
>> >>    possible community representative at:
>> >>    http://cameronneylon.net/blog/
>> >>    european-commission-open-science-policy-platform/
>> >>
>> >>    Bjoern Brembs has also got a similar post up:
>> >>    http://bjoern.brembs.net/2016/03/seeking-your-endorsement/
>> >>      I’d strongly support Jenny applying as both someone knowledgeable
>> and
>> >>    representative of younger researchers (certainly younger than me).
>> >>
>> >>    Cheers
>> >>
>> >>    Cameron
>> >>          On Mar 17, 2016, at 9:26 AM, Peter Murray-Rust <
>> pm286 at cam.ac.uk>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>        I will absolutely support Jenny in this. Neelie Kroes always
>> >>        highlighted the world-changing nature of Early Career
>> Researchers.
>> >>
>> >>        On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Jenny Molloy
>> >> <jenny.molloy at okfn.org>
>> >>        wrote:
>> >>
>> >>            Dear Open Science Working Group
>> >>
>> >>            Konrad Förstner suggests we should put forward someone for
>> the
>> >>            EU Open Science Policy Platform.
>> >>            More info:
>> >> https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=
>> >>            open-science-policy-platform
>> >>
>> >>            This would be a good chance to take forward our views and
>> >> interests
>> >>            at a high level in EU science policy. The nominations need
>> to
>> >> be in
>> >>            next Tuesday so it's a bit last minute!
>> >>
>> >>            I have been considering it and would be happy to put myself
>> >>            forward, but if anyone else strongly wants to be the
>> >> representative
>> >>            then please let us all know.
>> >>
>> >>            Also, it would be great to get a feeling for who else is
>> going
>> >> for
>> >>            this and whether it is looking like there is a good set of
>> >>            applications from the open community.
>> >>
>> >>            Best wishes
>> >>                      Jenny
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>                      _______________________________________________
>> >>            open-science mailing list
>> >>            open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> >>            https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> >>            Unsubscribe:
>> >> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>        --
>> >>        Peter Murray-Rust
>> >>        Reader in Molecular Informatics
>> >>        Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
>> >>        University of Cambridge
>> >>        CB2 1EW, UK
>> >>        +44-1223-763069
>> >>        _______________________________________________
>> >>        open-science mailing list
>> >>        open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> >>        https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> >>        Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>> >>
>> >>    --
>> >>    Professor Cameron Neylon
>> >>    Centre for Culture and Technology
>> >>    Curtin University, Western Australia
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Peter Murray-Rust
>> >> Reader in Molecular Informatics
>> >> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
>> >> University of Cambridge
>> >> CB2 1EW, UK
>> >> +44-1223-763069
>> >
>> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> open-science mailing list
>> >> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> >> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > open-science mailing list
>> > open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> > https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20160319/5bea35b6/attachment-0003.html>