[kforge-dev] Re: licence for kforge code
John Bywater
john.bywater at appropriatesoftwarefoundation.org
Mon Apr 25 06:10:22 UTC 2005
Hi Rufus,
<snip>
>> I'd prefer 1, given the system we are deriving from is GPL, and we
>> don't have a business plan for selling licenses, so that's probably a
>> sideshow that we should just forget about in order to keep things as
>> simple as possible.
>
>
> Agree totally.
Great.
<snip>
>
> I think, subject to comments from others that we should go down the
> pure GPL route.
OK. I've set things up to be (provisionally) under GPL in the Python
package.
<snip>
> My suggestion is that we should put the copyright under the name of
> the Open Knowledge Foundation initially and add other groups as
> necessary (how does this work on other projects ...?). Of course there
> should always be a credits file that lists /all/ contributors.
OK, that's totally fine. Let's do that. The copyright holder shall be
the Open Knowledge Foundation, and authors will be acknowledged.
Regards,
John.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rufus
>
>
>
More information about the kforge-dev
mailing list