[OpenGLAM] Open Gallery by Google

Fri Dec 13 01:54:54 UTC 2013

Yes, you do. I know several of us have requested them, but I haven't received anything after 2 days, and wondering if anyone else has.  It's hard for us to assess this at all if we haven't seen it. 

On Dec 12, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Noreen Whysel wrote:

> I thought you had to request one.
> 
>> True, gotta reward Open, not kinda Open, and use the same definition
>> consistently, which is the good thing about the OKFN def. maybe Heath
>> meant something more tongue-in-cheek, but I'm more of the mind of putting
>> the good examples out front with incentives and the like.
>> 
>> Speaking of not really open to all, has anyone gotten an actual Open
>> Gallery invite yet??
>> 
>> + + +
>> Sent from mobile device
>> 
>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 11/12/13 05:31 AM, heath rezabek wrote:
>>>> This is why I think it could be a very useful role for the OKF (or
>>>> someone) to have some kind of 'Openness Award" they can grant to
>>>> organizations, or even some form of it that can call attention to
>>>> projects that seem open but don't meet the Open Definition.  Such an
>>>> effort would yield press awareness over time, and change as well.
>>> 
>>> Rewarding not doing the right thing creates perverse incentives, though.
>>> 
>>> Projects that seem open but aren't deserve (constructive, initially
>>> private) criticism and offers of help, not praise.
>>> 
>>> - Rob.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> open-glam mailing list
>>> open-glam at lists.okfn.org
>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-glam
>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-glam
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-glam mailing list
>> open-glam at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-glam
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-glam
>> 
> 
> 