[OpenGLAM] Open Gallery by Google

[Noreen Whysel]

I thought you had to request one.

> True, gotta reward Open, not kinda Open, and use the same definition
> consistently, which is the good thing about the OKFN def. maybe Heath
> meant something more tongue-in-cheek, but I'm more of the mind of putting
> the good examples out front with incentives and the like.
>
> Speaking of not really open to all, has anyone gotten an actual Open
> Gallery invite yet??
>
> + + +
> Sent from mobile device
>
> On Dec 11, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
>
>> On 11/12/13 05:31 AM, heath rezabek wrote:
>>> This is why I think it could be a very useful role for the OKF (or
>>> someone) to have some kind of 'Openness Award" they can grant to
>>> organizations, or even some form of it that can call attention to
>>> projects that seem open but don't meet the Open Definition.  Such an
>>> effort would yield press awareness over time, and change as well.
>>
>> Rewarding not doing the right thing creates perverse incentives, though.
>>
>> Projects that seem open but aren't deserve (constructive, initially
>> private) criticism and offers of help, not praise.
>>
>> - Rob.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-glam mailing list
>> open-glam at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-glam
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-glam
> _______________________________________________
> open-glam mailing list
> open-glam at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-glam
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-glam
>