[open-science] IPCC report

Tue Oct 1 08:27:48 UTC 2013

Hi Peter, Media Lab Science Po is doing a study on IPCC contributors
http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/ipcc/
I just forward your email to them, I imagine/hope they could help if we
want to do a study on the openess of IPCC references.
I think this would be a great and powerful project, and I would be happy to
help.

Pierre

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> The IPCC report (
> http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5_WGI-12Doc2b_FinalDraft_All.pdf,
> ) was published in draft yesterday
> WORKING GROUP I CONTRIBUTION TO THE IPCC FIFTH ASSESSMENT REPORT
> CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS
>
> This is a critically important document for the human race. Yet how much
> of the science is Open? How accessible is it?
>
> One immediate concern is that many of the 9000+ references are closed. Can
> we highlight this concern , e.g. by Crowdcrafting the analysis of the
> references? How many are closed? How much would it cost a concerned citizen
> (or group of citizens) to read all the references?
>
> --
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>
>

-- 
*Pierre Chrzanowski*
*Open Knowledge Foundation France*

Mail: pierre.chrzanowski at gmail.com
Mobile: +33 (0)7 855 71 292 | Skype: pierre.chrzanowski | Twitter:
@piezanowski <https://twitter.com/piezanowski>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20131001/d5750acd/attachment-0001.html>