[open-science] OKFN Open Science Mailing List will close on 31 Jan 2020 - where to next?

[Jenny Molloy]

Hi Ted

I don't know if that was discussed but as there was no offer to host the
archives in any format, I would guess there is no time or funding at the
OKFN end.
You could make the suggestion to them for sure, I think the correct email
would be network at okfn.org as that is where the original announcement came
from.
As you say, it could motivate people to move platforms as Discourse will be
the only one supported from now on.

Jenny

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 2:57 PM Ted Strauss <ted at trudat.co> wrote:

> Hello,
> I'm not sure if this has been considered, but there is a method to
> import/ingest the mbox archive of the listserv into the discourse forum.
> Then you'll maintain the history of those conversations and they will be
> searchable in discourse.
> Here is a thread describing a method to do that:
>
> https://meta.discourse.org/t/importing-mailing-lists-mbox-listserv-google-groups-emails/79773
> It's not trivial to do, but it would address concerns about losing this
> history, while motivating the shift over to the Discourse forum.
> I'm sure someone on the Discourse marketplace channel
> <https://meta.discourse.org/c/marketplace/14> could make quick work of
> this for a reasonable price.
> Cheers
> Ted Strauss
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 5:24 AM Jenny Molloy <jcmcoppice12 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> I requested the files for archiving but have heard nothing further to the
>> conversation I copy below.
>> Stephen says: for your information, the HTML archive for open-science is
>> 95MB and the mbox file is 83MB, while the open-science-dev HTML archive is
>> 726kb and the mbox file is 1.7MB.
>>
>> Federico Leva suggested that The Wikimedia Italia may host the entire
>> archive of the OKFN mailman.
>> Is that going ahead, Fedrico? That would solve the archiving part at
>> least!
>>
>> Jenny
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Stephen Abbott Pugh
>> Date: Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 6:52 AM
>> Subject: Re: Open Knowledge Foundation: Important announcement regarding
>> the mailing list(s) you manage
>> To: Jenny Molloy
>>
>> No problem. We'll provide both.
>> Thanks
>>
>> Stephen Abbott Pugh
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 01:31, Jenny Molloy wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Stephen
>>>
>>> If it possible to send both that would be great, we are still deciding
>>> how to make them available.
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>
>>> Jenny
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:09 PM Stephen Abbott Pugh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Jenny,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your response. We will be happy to provide you with a
>>>> copy of the archive as either a compressed HTML archive or an mbox file.
>>>> For your information, the HTML archive for open-science is 95MB and the
>>>> mbox file is 83MB, while the open-science-dev HTML archive is 726kb and the
>>>> mbox file is 1.7MB.
>>>> Please let me know if you have a preference for which format you'd like
>>>> to receive these files in.
>>>> All the best,
>>>>
>>>> Stephen Abbott Pugh
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:30 AM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings
>>> In the course of the years, I signed up to some of those lists and found
>>> them useful
>>> from time to time, to connect with people working on related issues-
>>> would be tempted to suggest that in addition to archiving them where
>>> possible
>>> a new consolidated mailing list is opened and an invite sent to all
>>> subscribers of those lists
>>> for those who wish to keep in touch with the topics and people
>>> Something like a meta open knowledge mailing list
>>> PDM
>>> PDM
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 8:05 AM Pierre Chrzanowski <
>>> pierre.chrzanowski at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Frederico, Jenny, all
>>>>
>>>> first, a very happy New Year to all in this list.
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering: any news about a coordinated effort on moving /
>>>> archiving okfn mailing lists?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Pierre.
>>>>
>>>> Le mer. 20 nov. 2019 à 10:10 AM, Jenny Molloy <jcmcoppice12 at gmail.com>
>>>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Federico
>>>>>
>>>>> That's great news!
>>>>> The email about the mailing lists came from network at okfn.org so I
>>>>> assume that's the best one to contact, I don't know who that goes to
>>>>> because there was no sign-off.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jenny
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:18 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) <
>>>>> nemowiki at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jenny Molloy, 19/11/19 17:11:
>>>>>> > Would anyone be willing to assess the options
>>>>>> > provided above and make this happen?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Wikimedia Italia sysadmin offers to host the entire archive of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> OKFN mailman. Can you put us in contact?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>         Federico
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> open-science mailing list
>>>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> open-science mailing list
>>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-science mailing list
>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20200115/67dba601/attachment-0002.html>